Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Howlin, O. Udwin (2002)
Outcomes in neurodevelopmental and genetic disorders
D. Fanurik, J. Koh, M. Schmitz, Dale Harrison, Timothy Conrad (1999)
Children with cognitive impairment: parent report of pain and coping.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP, 20 4
C. Bartlett, K. Bunning (1997)
The Importance of Communication Partnerships: A Study to Investigate the Communicative Exchanges Between Staff and Adults with Learning DisabilitiesBritish Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25
N. Grove, K. Bunning, J. Porter, C. Olsson (1999)
See What I Mean: Interpreting the Meaning of Communication by People with Severe and Profound Intellectual DisabilitiesJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12
J. Matson, B. Smiroldo, M. Hamilton, C. Baglio (1997)
Do anxiety disorders exist in persons with severe and profound mental retardation?Research in developmental disabilities, 18 1
S. Zwakhalen, Katinka Dongen, J. Hamers, H. Abu‐Saad (2004)
Pain assessment in intellectually disabled people: non-verbal indicators.Journal of advanced nursing, 45 3
J. Bradshaw (2001)
Communication Partnerships with People with Profound and Multiple Learning DisabilitiesTizard Learning Disability Review, 6
A. Carter, F. Volkmar, S. Sparrow, Jing-Jen Wang, C. Lord, G. Dawson, E. Fombonne, K. Loveland, G. Mesibov, E. Schopler (1998)
The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Supplementary Norms for Individuals with AutismJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28
T. Oberlander, Maureen O'Donnell, Carolyne Montgomery (1999)
Pain in children with significant neurological impairment.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP, 20 4
John Weisz, Keith Yeates (1979)
Cognitive development in retarded and nonretarded persons: Piagetian tests of the similar sequence hypothesis.Psychological bulletin, 86 4
M. Valdovinos, J. Zarcone, J. Hellings, G. Kim, S. Schroeder (2004)
Using the Diagnostic Assessment of the Severely Handicapped-II (DASH-II) to measure the therapeutic effects of risperidone.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 48 1
R. Chaney (1996)
Psychological stress in people with profound mental retardation.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 40 ( Pt 4)
Beail Beail (2003)
Utility of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales in diagnosis and research with adults who have mental retardationMental Retardation, 41
R. Astor (2001)
Detecting pain in people with profound learning disabilities.Nursing times, 97 40
J. Hogg (1998)
Competence and Quality in the Lives of People with Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities: Some Recent ResearchTizard Learning Disability Review, 3
James Hogg (2008)
The administration of psychotropic and anticonvulsant drugs to children with profound intellectual disability and multiple impairments.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 36 ( Pt 6)
N. Beail (2003)
What works for people with mental retardation? Critical commentary on cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic psychotherapy research.Mental retardation, 41 6
A. Došen (2005)
Applying the developmental perspective in the psychiatric assessment and diagnosis of persons with intellectual disability: part I--assessment.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 49 Pt 1
J. Hogg, J. Sebba, L. Lambe (1990)
Profound Retardation and Multiple Impairment
Johnny Matson, K. Rush, Martha Hamilton, Stephen Anderson, J. Bamburg, C. Baglio, Don Williams, S. Kirkpatrick-Sanchez (1999)
Characteristics of depression as assessed by the Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped-II (DASH-II).Research in developmental disabilities, 20 4
Abstract The task of assessing people with profound intellectual disabilities and multiple impairments can be a daunting one, for experienced and newly qualified clinicians and practitioners alike. Difficulties with definitions in the context of challenging, excluding service delivery models can sometimes lead to incoherent and inconsistent approaches. The author examines a number of issues, including the paucity of adequately sensitive, standardized assessment tools, the importance of collaborative working, and the acknowledgment that services can be ill‐equipped to face the challenges presented by people with such complex and chronic support needs. The role of an overly generic service philosophy in potentially limiting the work of clinicians is noted, and the author notes that evaluating development is a crucial factor in any overall assessment. The author concludes with a number of recommendations for developing good practice in this crucial area of the support process, including: agree on terminology and inclusion criteria; take a transdisciplinary approach; use a developmental model; consider the impact of neurological conditions; select measures and informants carefully; and consider the assessment as an intervention.
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.