Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Developing Good Practice in the Clinical Assessment of People With Profound Intellectual Disabilities and Multiple Impairment

Developing Good Practice in the Clinical Assessment of People With Profound Intellectual... Abstract The task of assessing people with profound intellectual disabilities and multiple impairments can be a daunting one, for experienced and newly qualified clinicians and practitioners alike. Difficulties with definitions in the context of challenging, excluding service delivery models can sometimes lead to incoherent and inconsistent approaches. The author examines a number of issues, including the paucity of adequately sensitive, standardized assessment tools, the importance of collaborative working, and the acknowledgment that services can be ill‐equipped to face the challenges presented by people with such complex and chronic support needs. The role of an overly generic service philosophy in potentially limiting the work of clinicians is noted, and the author notes that evaluating development is a crucial factor in any overall assessment. The author concludes with a number of recommendations for developing good practice in this crucial area of the support process, including: agree on terminology and inclusion criteria; take a transdisciplinary approach; use a developmental model; consider the impact of neurological conditions; select measures and informants carefully; and consider the assessment as an intervention. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Wiley

Developing Good Practice in the Clinical Assessment of People With Profound Intellectual Disabilities and Multiple Impairment

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/developing-good-practice-in-the-clinical-assessment-of-people-with-5nOg4O2bEE

References (20)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1741-1122
eISSN
1741-1130
DOI
10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00105.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The task of assessing people with profound intellectual disabilities and multiple impairments can be a daunting one, for experienced and newly qualified clinicians and practitioners alike. Difficulties with definitions in the context of challenging, excluding service delivery models can sometimes lead to incoherent and inconsistent approaches. The author examines a number of issues, including the paucity of adequately sensitive, standardized assessment tools, the importance of collaborative working, and the acknowledgment that services can be ill‐equipped to face the challenges presented by people with such complex and chronic support needs. The role of an overly generic service philosophy in potentially limiting the work of clinicians is noted, and the author notes that evaluating development is a crucial factor in any overall assessment. The author concludes with a number of recommendations for developing good practice in this crucial area of the support process, including: agree on terminology and inclusion criteria; take a transdisciplinary approach; use a developmental model; consider the impact of neurological conditions; select measures and informants carefully; and consider the assessment as an intervention.

Journal

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual DisabilitiesWiley

Published: Jun 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.