Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
O. Benson (2008)
Praise be to podsThe Philosophers’ Magazine
Benjamin Sovacool (2008)
Renewable Energy: Economically Sound, Politically DifficultThe Electricity Journal, 21
(2006)
and Agriculture Organization
Will we have enough materials for energy-significant PV production?'' Solar Energy Technologies Program
(2008)
Energy Watch Group
R. Gordon, M. Bertram, T. Graedel (2006)
Metal stocks and sustainabilityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103
S. Pacala, R. Socolow (2004)
Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current TechnologiesScience, 305
(2010)
energy payback ratio and CO 2 gas emission rates from coal, fission, wind, and DT-fusion electrical power plants. Fusion Engineering and Design 2000; 48 :473–481
A. Jager-Waldau, T. Huld, M. Súri, T. Cebecauer, E. Dunlop, H. Ossenbrink (2006)
Challenges to Realise 1% Electricity from Photovoltaic Solar Systems in the European Union by 20202006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference, 2
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 . FAO: Rome, 2006
Jager-Waldau (2006)
Challenges to realize 1% electricity from photovoltaic solar systems in the European union by 2020Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2
Benjamin Sovacool, Christopher Cooper (2008)
Nuclear Nonsense: Why Nuclear Power is No Answer to Climate Change and the World's Post-Kyoto Energy ChallengesWilliam and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 33
According to the numbers provided in these studies, updated to $2007, every kWh of nuclear electricity generation has 11.1 cents of damages per kWh;
T. Sundqvist (2004)
What causes the disparity of electricity externality estimatesEnergy Policy, 32
(2007)
Representative biomass CHP system cost and performance profiles
(2007)
Representative biomass CHP system cost and performance profiles. EPA Combined Heat and Power Partnership Biomass CHP Catalog
V. Utgikar, J. Scott (2006)
Energy forecasting: Predictions, reality and analysis of causes of errorEnergy Policy, 34
M. Bolinger, R. Wiser (2009)
Wind power price trends in the United States: Struggling to remain competitive in the face of strong growthEnergy Policy, 37
M. Miller (2010)
AgencyChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42
T. Sundqvist, P. Soederholm (2002)
Valuing the environmental impacts of electricity generation : a critical survey, 8
A. Chambers, N. Nakicenovic (2008)
World Energy Outlook 2008
(2002)
Licensing and building new nuclear infrastructure
R. Jones (1995)
The nuclear revolution
Q. Schiermeier, J. Tollefson, T. Scully, A. Witze, O. Morton (2008)
Energy alternatives: Electricity without carbonNature, 454
H. Wooten (1953)
Major Uses of Land in the United States
Benjamin (2008)
Sovacool and Christopher Cooper nuclear nonsense: Why nuclear power is no answer to climate change and the world's post-kyoto energy challengesWilliam and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 33
Marilyn Brown, Benjamin Sovacool (2007)
Developing an 'energy sustainability index' to evaluate energy policyInterdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32
C. Elvidge, C. Milesi, J. Dietz, B. Tuttle, Paul Sutton, R. Nemani, J. Vogelmann (2004)
U.S. constructed area approaches the size of OhioEos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 85
B. Tonn, K. Healy, Amy Gibson, Ashutosh Ashish, P. Cody, Drew Beres, Sam Lulla, J. Mazur, A. Ritter (2009)
Power from Perspective: Potential future United States energy portfoliosEnergy Policy, 37
(2005)
Factors Affecting Costs of Geo-thermalPowerDevelopment
Report to the U.S. Hydropower Council for International Development
(2002)
of Agriculture
(2002)
Hydroelectric power: Untapped resources. Report to the U.S
D. Pimentel, M. Herz, M. Glickstein, Mathew Zimmerman, Richard Allen, K. Becker, Jeff Evans, Ben-Azza Hussain, Ryan Sarsfeld, Anat Grosfeld, T. Seidel (2002)
Renewable Energy: Current and Potential Issues, 52
(2010)
World Energy Model: Methodology and Assumptions , OECD: Paris, 2008
R. Wiser, M. Bollinger, G. Barbose, K. Belyeu, M. Hand, D. Heimiller, D. Lew, M. Milligan, A. Mills, Alejandro Moreno, W. Musial, R. O'Connell, K. Porter, Z. Subin (2008)
Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and Performance Trends: 2006Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
(2003)
Energy Technology Fact Sheet : Solar PV
International Energy Agency (2008)
10.1787/weo-2008-en
(2006)
Energy Demands on Water Resources : Report to Congress on the Interdependence of Energy and Water
V. Sektorov, N. Poltoratskaya (1969)
World hydropower and hydropower constructionHydrotechnical Construction, 4
(2000)
The rate of extraction for many geochemically scarce metals from the lithosphere has increased in excess of 3 percent per year from 1950
Martin Tampier (2004)
Best uses of biomassRefocus, 5
Scott White, G. Kulcinski (2000)
Birth to death analysis of the energy payback ratio and CO2 gas emission rates from coal, fission, wind, and DT-fusion electrical power plantsFusion Engineering and Design, 48
(2006)
of Energy
This article evaluates whether the world can transition to a future global electricity system powered entirely by nuclear power plants, wind turbines, solar panels, geothermal facilities, hydroelectric stations, and biomass generators by 2030. It begins by explaining the scenario method employed for predicting future electricity generation, drawn mostly from tools used by the International Energy Agency. The article projects that the world would need to build about 7744 Gigawatts (GW) of installed electricity capacity by 2030 to provide 37.2 thousand terawatt‐hours (TWh). Synthesizing data from the primary literature, the article argues that meeting such a projection with nuclear and renewable power stations will be difficult. If constructed using commercially available and state‐of‐the‐art nuclear and renewable power stations today, the capital cost would exceed $40 trillion, anticipated negative externalities would exceed $1 trillion per year, and immense strain would be placed on land, water, material, and human resources. Even if nuclear and renewable power technologies were much improved, trillions of dollars of investment would still be needed, millions of hectares of land set aside, quadrillions of gallons of water used, and material supplies of aluminum, concrete, silicon, and steel heavily utilized or exhausted. Because of these constraints, the only true path towards a more sustainable electricity system appears to be reducing demand for electricity and consuming less of it. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journal of Energy Research – Wiley
Published: Oct 25, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.