Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Pittock, Roger Jones, Chris Mitchell (2001)
Probabilities will help us plan for climate changeNature, 413
J. Hansen, M. Sato, R. Ruedy, A. Lacis, V. Oinas (2000)
Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97 18
S. H. Schneider, K. Kuntz-Duriseti, C. Azar (2000)
Costing Non-linearities, Surprises and Irreversible EventsPacific and Asian Journal of Energy, 10
T. Wigley, S. Raper (2001)
Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean WarmingScience, 293
Roger Jones (2000)
Managing Uncertainty in Climate Change Projections – Issues for Impact AssessmentClimatic Change, 45
S. Schneider (1983)
CO2, Climate and Society: A Brief Overview
A. Grübler, N. Nakicenovic (2001)
Identifying dangers in an uncertain climateNature, 412
S. H. Schneider (1983)
Social Science Research and Climatic Change: An Interdisciplinary Appraisal
R. Lempert, M. Schlesinger (2000)
Robust Strategies for Abating Climate ChangeClimatic Change, 45
(2001)
Mitigation
J. Reilly, P. Stone, C. Forest, M. Webster, H. Jacoby, R. Prinn (2001)
Uncertainty and Climate Change AssessmentsScience, 293
N. Andronova, M. Schlesinger (2001)
Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivityJournal of Geophysical Research, 106
M. Morgan, M. Henrion (1990)
Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis
R. H. Moss, S. H. Schneider (2000)
Third Assessment Report: Cross Cutting Issues Guidance Papers
S. Schneider (2001)
What is 'dangerous' climate change?Nature, 411
D. Wuebbles (2002)
Oversimplifying the GreenhouseClimatic Change, 52
(2001)
The Scientific Basis
N. Nakicenovic, S. Swart (2000)
A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(2001)
Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
S. H. Schneider, K. Kuntz-Duriseti (2002)
Climate Change Policy: A Survey
CAN WE ESTIMATE THE LIKELIHOOD OF CLIMATIC CHANGES AT 2100? An Editorial Comment Why This Editorial? In 1988, in the wake of massive heat waves in North America, James Hansen, Director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City, garnered international publicity for asserting that it was time to stop ‘waffling’ and accept the fact that the increase in temperature trends in the late twentieth century were likely to be due to human activities, in particular global warming induced by greenhouse gas increases. This controversial assertion earned for Jim Hansen the enmity of many in the fossil fuel industry and the praise of environmental groups. Therefore, twelve years later when Hansen and colleagues published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science in August 2000 (Hansen et al., 2000) that some of Hansen’s original detractors labeled a ‘recantation’, this, too, generated a great deal of controversy. Hansen et al. laid out a number of points, including a proposed low CO emission scenario based upon trends of CO 2 2 increase in the past decade, which he details in a Response (Hansen, 2002) in this issue of Climatic Change to a critical Editorial
Climatic Change – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 10, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.