Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Daniel Kemmis (1990)
Community and Politics of Place
R. Stoker (1989)
A REGIME FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION ANALYSIS: COOPERATION AND RECONCILIATION OF FEDERALIST IMPERATIVESReview of Policy Research, 9
D. Blahna, Susan Yonts‐Shepard (1989)
Public involvement in resource planning: Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementationSociety & Natural Resources, 2
Sandra Braman (2003)
The Policy Orientation
D. Kemmis (1990)
Community and the Politics of Place
T. C. Beierle (1999)
Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisionsPolicy Studies Review, 16
Mark Imperial, T. Hennessey (1999)
Environmental Governance in Watersheds: Collaboration, Public Value, and Accountability
J. Lemons, L. Westra, R. Goodland (1998)
Ecological sustainability and integrity : concepts and approaches
A. Conley, M. Moote (2003)
Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagementSociety & Natural Resources, 16
W. Leach (2002)
Surveying Diverse Stakeholder GroupsSociety & Natural Resources, 15
Sherry Amstein (1969)
“A Ladder of Citizen Participation”Journal of The American Planning Association, 35
S. Carpenter (2001)
Managing Public Disputes
C. W. Coughlin, M. L. Hoben, D. W. Manskopf, S. W. Quesada (1999)
A Systematic Assessment of Collaborative Resource Management Partnerships
S. Yaffee, A. Phillips, Irene Frentz, Paul Hardy, S. Maleki, Barbara Thorpe (1996)
Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment Of Current Experience
K. Lee (1993)
Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment
EPA Ohio (1997)
A Guide to Developing Local Watershed Action Plans in Ohio
K. Korfmacher (2000)
What's the Point of Partnering?American Behavioral Scientist, 44
R. Grumbine (1994)
What Is Ecosystem ManagementConservation Biology, 8
Archon Fung, E. Wright (2001)
Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory GovernancePolitics & Society, 29
D. Slocombe (1993)
Implementing Ecosystem-Based ManagementBioScience, 43
W. Leach, N. Pelkey, P. Sabatier (2002)
Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and WashingtonJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21
N. Christensen, A. Bartuska, James Brown, Stephen Carpenter, Carla D’Antonio, Robert Francis, Jerry Franklin, J. Macmahon, Reed Noss, David Parsons, Charles Peterson, Monica Turner, R. Woodmansee (1996)
The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem ManagementEcological Applications, 6
Thomas Beierle (2005)
USING SOCIAL GOALS TO EVALUATE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONSReview of Policy Research, 16
R. Sorensen, D. Lerner, H. Lasswell (1953)
The Policy Sciences, 43
E. A. Moore, T. M. Koontz (2003)
A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based and mixed partnershipsSociety and Natural Resources, 16
K. Korfmacher (1998)
Invisible successes, visible failures: Paradoxes of ecosystem management in the Albemarle‐Pamlico estuarine studyCoastal Management, 26
Udaya Wagle (2000)
The policy science of democracy: The issues of methodology and citizen participationPolicy Sciences, 33
R. O’Leary (1998)
Managing for the Environment: Understanding the Legal, Organizational, and Policy Challenges
D. A. Dilman (2000)
Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
D. S. Slocombe (1993)
Implementing ecosystem-based management: Development of theory, practice and research for planning and managing a regionBioScience, 43
F. Fischer (1993)
Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical casesPolicy Sciences, 26
L. Duram, Katharin Brown (1999)
Insights and Applications Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Watershed Planning InitiativesSociety & Natural Resources, 12
Joe Bonnell (2001)
Group processes and ecosystem based management : an in-depth qualitative case study of a multi-stakeholder watershed management group /
R. Steinzor (2000)
The Corruption of Civic EnvironmentalismThe Environmental Law Reporter
K. Smith Korfmacher (2000)
What's the point of partnering? Acase study of ecosystem management in the Darby Creek WatershedAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 44
Eileen Gauna (1998)
The Environmental Justice Misfit: Public Participation and the Paradigm Paradox, 17
Mary Zalesny, R. Lewicki, B. Gray, Michael Elliott (2003)
Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and CasesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 48
Floyd Fowler (1984)
Survey Research Methods
M. Miles, A. M. Huberman (1994)
Qualitative Data Analysis
Craig Thomas (1999)
Linking Public Agencies With Community‐Based Watershed Organizations: Lessons From CaliforniaPolicy Studies Journal, 27
Z. Smith (1991)
The Environmental Policy Paradox
Kai Lee (1993)
Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Kai N. Lee. 1993. Island Press, Washington, DC. 290 pages. ISBN: 1-59963-197-X. $25.00Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 15
C. Moseley (2006)
New ideas, old institutions : environment, community, and state in the Pacific Northwest
W. Leach, N. Pelkey (2001)
Making Watershed Partnerships Work: A Review of the Empirical LiteratureJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127
E. Weber (1998)
Pluralism by the Rules: Conflict and Cooperation in Environmental Regulation
R. O’Leary, Susan Raines (2001)
Lessons Learned from Two Decades of Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs and Processes at the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyPublic Administration Review, 61
B. Gray (1989)
Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multi-Party Problems
S. R. Arnstein (1969)
A ladder of citizen participationAmerican Institute of Planners Journal, 35
E. Poncelet (2001)
Personal transformation in multistakeholder environmental partnershipsPolicy Sciences, 34
R. Keiter (1995)
Greater Yellowstone: Managing a charismatic ecosystemNatural Resources and Environmental Issues, 3
M. Norusis (2000)
SPSS 13.0 Guide to Data Analysis
David Pritzker, D. Dalton (1995)
Negotiated rulemaking sourcebook
L. Locke, S. Silverman, W. Spirduso (1998)
Reading and understanding research
Patrick Haney, R. Herzberg, Rick Wilson (1992)
Advice and ConsentJournal of Conflict Resolution, 36
B. Shindler, J. Neburka (1997)
Public participation in forest planning: eight attributes of successJournal of Forestry, 95
Richard Krueger (1989)
Focus groups : a practical guide for applied researchJournal of Marketing Research, 26
F. Lynn, G. Busenberg (1995)
Citizen Advisory Committees and Environmental Policy: What We Know, What's Left to DiscoverRisk Analysis, 15
C. Malone (1998)
THE FEDERAL ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE IN THE UNITED STATES
W. Kellogg (1998)
Adopting an ecosystem approach: Local variability in remedial action planningSociety & Natural Resources, 11
S. Bates (1993)
Searching Out the Headwaters: Change And Rediscovery In Western Water Policy
M. Beattie (1996)
An Ecosystem Approach to Fish and Wildlife ConservationEcological Applications, 6
F. Babb (1996)
After the RevolutionLatin American Perspectives, 23
Elizabeth Moore, T. Koontz (2003)
Research Note A Typology of Collaborative Watershed Groups: Citizen-Based, Agency-Based, and Mixed PartnershipsSociety & Natural Resources, 16
R. S. Brown, K. Marshall (1996)
Ecosystem management in state govrnmentsEcological Applications, 6
R. P. Stoker (1989)
Aregime framework for implementation analysis: Cooperation and reconciliation of federalist imperativesPolicy Studies Review, 9
L. A. Duram, K. G. Brown (1999)
Assessing public participation in U.S. watershed planning initiativesSociety and Natural Resources, 12
C. R. Malone (2000)
State governments, ecosystem and the Enlibra Doctrine in the USEcological Economics, 34
D. Roush (2002)
Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource managementElectronic Green Journal, 1
C. Chess, B. Hance, G. Gibson (2000)
Adaptive participation in watershed management.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55
D. H. Davis (1998)
American Environmental Politics
D. Snow (2001)
Across the Great Divide: Explorations in Collaborative Conservation and the American West
H. Cortner, M. Moote (1998)
The Politics of Ecosystem Management
D. John (1993)
Civic Environmentalism: Alternatives to Regulation in States and Communities
P. Deleon (1997)
Democracy and the policy sciences
W. Rosenbaum (2000)
Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-first Century
S. Nagel, M. Mills (1991)
Systematic analysis in dispute resolution
C. Malone (2000)
State governments, ecosystem management, and the enlibra doctrine in the USEcological Economics, 34
P. Salant, D. Dillman (1994)
How to conduct your own survey
T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin (2001)
The Politics of Toxic Waste: 21st Century Challenges
Deborah Carr, Steve Selin, M. Schuett (1998)
Managing Public Forests: Understanding the Role of Collaborative PlanningEnvironmental Management, 22
D. Kenney (1997)
Resource Management at the Watershed Level: An Assessment of the Changing Federal Role in the Emerging Era of Community-Based Watershed Management
Steve Selin, D. Chevez (1995)
Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and managementEnvironmental Management, 19
Bart Johnson, R. Campbell (1999)
Ecology and Participation in Landscape-Based Planning Within the Pacific NorthwestPolicy Studies Journal, 27
(2000)
Unified federal policy for a watershed approach to federal land and resource managementFederal Register, 65
The role of the public in US policy making has shifted substantially during the past several decades. This shift is particularly evident in environmental policy, where collaboration among multiple stakeholders is on the rise. Much of the literature on collaborative environmental management emphasizes the need for widespread community involvement, especially from private citizens. Many proponents of collaboration have argued that broad inclusion can lead to better environmental solutions while also establishing legitimacy, building social capital, and overcoming conflicts. Yet such broad inclusion may be costly in terms of time, energy, and resources, and it may not yield the desired results. Thus, a key question is how the breadth of public involvement is linked to collaborative group accomplishments. This study, using watershed groups in Ohio, demonstrates several links between group membership and results. Groups with a broader array of participants tend to excel in watershed plan creation, identifying/prioritizing issues, and group development and maintenance. In addition, groups comprised of a relatively balanced mix of governmental and non-governmental participants are more likely to list planning/research and group development and maintenance results than are groups comprised primarily of non-governmental participants. In contrast, groups with a narrower membership and groups that are composed primarily of non-governmental participants may focus more on pressuring government for policy change.
Policy Sciences – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 14, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.