Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective

Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective All species have limited distributions at broad geographical scales. At local scales, the distribution of many species is influenced by the interplay of the three factors of habitat availability, local extinctions and colonization dynamics. We use the standard Levins metapopulation model to illustrate how gradients in these three factors can generate species’ range limits. We suggest that the three routes to range limits have radically different evolutionary implications. Because the Levins model makes simplifying assumptions about the spatial coupling of local populations, we present numerical studies of spatially explicit metapopulation models that complement the analytical model. The three routes to range limits give rise to distinct spatiotemporal patterns. Range limits in one species can also arise because of environmental gradients impinging upon other species. We briefly discuss a predator–prey example, which illustrates indirect routes to range limits in a metacommunity context. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecology Letters Wiley

Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective

Holt, R.D.; Keitt, T.H.
Ecology Letters , Volume 3 (1) – Jan 1, 2000
Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/alternative-causes-for-range-limits-a-metapopulation-perspective-2neJI6RF0w

References (14)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Blackwell Science Ltd
ISSN
1461-023X
eISSN
1461-0248
DOI
10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00116.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

All species have limited distributions at broad geographical scales. At local scales, the distribution of many species is influenced by the interplay of the three factors of habitat availability, local extinctions and colonization dynamics. We use the standard Levins metapopulation model to illustrate how gradients in these three factors can generate species’ range limits. We suggest that the three routes to range limits have radically different evolutionary implications. Because the Levins model makes simplifying assumptions about the spatial coupling of local populations, we present numerical studies of spatially explicit metapopulation models that complement the analytical model. The three routes to range limits give rise to distinct spatiotemporal patterns. Range limits in one species can also arise because of environmental gradients impinging upon other species. We briefly discuss a predator–prey example, which illustrates indirect routes to range limits in a metacommunity context.

Journal

Ecology Letters – Wiley

Published: Jan 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.