Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Hutto, Sandra Pletschet, P. Hendricks (1986)
A Fixed-Radius Point Count Method for Nonbreeding and Breeding-Season UseThe Auk, 103
R. Greenberg, R. Reitsma, Andrea Angón (1996)
Interspecific aggression by Yellow Warblers in a sun coffee plantationThe Condor, 98
(1992)
Causas y naturaleza del mal de viñas en cafetos de Guatemala
(1993)
New technology in coffee production: examining landscape transformation and international aid in northern Latin America
(1992)
Importancia de los cafetales mixtos para la conservación de la biodiversidad de mamíferos
F. James, S. Rathbun (1981)
Rarefaction, Relative Abundance, and Diversity of Avian CommunitiesThe Auk, 98
D. Pimentel, U. Stachow, D. Takács, Hans Brubaker, A. Dumas, John Meaney, John O'Neil, Douglas Onsi, David Corzilius (1992)
CONSERVING BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN AGRICULTURAL/FORESTRY SYSTEMSBioScience, 42
J. Wunderle, R. Waide (1993)
Distribution of overwintering nearctic migrants in the Bahamas and Greater AntillesThe Condor, 95
D. Petit, L. Petit, V. Saab, T. Martin (1995)
Fixed-Radius Point Counts in Forests: Factors Influencing Effectiveness and Efficiency, 149
A. Anthony, Ludlow Griscom (1932)
The distribution of bird-life in Guatemala : a contribution to a study of the origin of Central American bird-life. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 64
P. Frischknecht, Jindra Ulmer-Dufek, T. Baumann (1986)
Purine alkaloid formation in buds and developing leaflets of Coffea arabica: Expression of an optimal defence strategy?Phytochemistry, 25
(1994)
Understanding biodiversity loss in agroecosystems: Reduction of ant diversity resulting from transformations of the coffee ecosystem in Costa Rica
J. Wunderle, S. Latta (1996)
AVIAN ABUNDANCE IN SUN AND SHADE COFFEE PLANTATIONS AND REMNANT PINE FOREST IN THE CORDILLERA CENTRAL, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
H. Borrero (1986)
La substitución de cafetales de sombrío por caturrales y su efecto negativo sobre la fauna de vertebradosCaldasia, 15
(1932)
The distribution of birdlife in Guatemala
(1982)
Coffee production systems in Mexico
(1982)
Estudio ecológico de las aves del cafetal
L. Dice (1945)
Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between SpeciesEcology, 26
P. Coley, J. Bryant, F. Chapin (1985)
Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore DefenseScience, 230
(1994)
Caficultura moderna. Serie Communicacion Agricola
I. Perfecto, R. Rice, R. Greenberg, M. Voort (1996)
Shade Coffee: A Disappearing Refuge for Biodiversity Shade coffee plantations can contain as much biodiversity as forest habitatsBioScience, 46
J. Vannini (1994)
Nearctic avian migrants in coffee plantations and forest fragments of south-western GuatemalaBird Conservation International, 4
(1990)
Systat: the system for statistics
(1989)
SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6
C. Robbins, B. Dowell, D. Dawson, J. Colon, R. Estrada, A. Sutton, R. Sutton, D. Weyer (1992)
Comparison of neotropical migrant landbird populations wintering in tropical forest, isolated forest fragments, and agricultural habitats
R. Greenberg, Peter Bichier, J. Sterling (1997)
Bird Populations in Rustic and Planted Shade Coffee Plantations of Eastern Chiapas, MéxicoBiotropica, 29
J. Hagan, D. Johnston (1992)
Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds
We studied the avifauna of sun and shade coffee plantations and associated mid‐elevation habitats during the dry season of 1995. The three plantation types (Inga, Gliricidia, and sun) showed high faunistic similarities with each other and were both distinct and depauperate compared to matorral and forest patch habitats. Of all the coffee plantation habitats, Inga shade had the highest diversity. Species associated with wooded vegetation were more common in shade plantations, particularly in Inga. A second census showed a decline in bird numbers that was more pronounced in sun and Gliricidia than in Inga plantations. Overall, differences between the plantation types were small and all coffee plantations were less diverse than traditional coffee farms previously studied in nearby Chiapas, México. The relatively low bird diversity was probably due to the low stature, low tree species diversity, and heavy pruning of the canopy. These features reflect management practices that are common throughout Latin America. The most common species of birds in all coffee plantation habitats were common second‐growth or edge species; more specialized forest species were almost completely absent from plantations. Furthermore, many common matorral species were rare or absent from coffee plantations, even sun plantations with which matorral shares a similar superficial structure. Coffee plantations probably will only be important for avian diversity if a tall, taxonomically and structurally diverse canopy is maintained. We suggest this is most likely to occur on farms that are managed for a variety of products rather than those designated entirely for the production of coffee.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Apr 20, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.