Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Conservation Biologist as Zen Student

The Conservation Biologist as Zen Student David Barash published an article in 1973 entitled “The Ecologist as Zen Master” in which he discussed what he considered the remarkable parallels between Zen Buddhism and the then emerging public concept of ecology. He felt that the interdependence and unity of all things was fundamental to both the practice of Zen and the science of ecology. In addition, both share a common nondualistic view of the fundamental identity of subject and surroundings. A bison cannot be understood in isolation from the prairie; understanding requires study of the bison-prairie unit. He concluded that “the very study of ecology is the elaboration of Zen’s nondualistic thinking.” Barash also discussed how the environmental problems the public was then just becoming aware of resulted from the Western view of the dichotomy between humans and nature. The exploitation of nature as something external and separate from humans has had disastrous consequences in both ancient and modern times. A primary problem is that we behave in a way that we believe benefits ourselves at the expense of nature. This is true both at a collective level (jobs versus the environment) and an individual level (driving a car versus riding a bike). This perception http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Conservation Biology Wiley

The Conservation Biologist as Zen Student

Conservation Biology , Volume 11 (5) – Oct 16, 1997

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-conservation-biologist-as-zen-student-1ZNDHYuRRG

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Society for Conservation Biology
ISSN
0888-8892
eISSN
1523-1739
DOI
10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.97023.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

David Barash published an article in 1973 entitled “The Ecologist as Zen Master” in which he discussed what he considered the remarkable parallels between Zen Buddhism and the then emerging public concept of ecology. He felt that the interdependence and unity of all things was fundamental to both the practice of Zen and the science of ecology. In addition, both share a common nondualistic view of the fundamental identity of subject and surroundings. A bison cannot be understood in isolation from the prairie; understanding requires study of the bison-prairie unit. He concluded that “the very study of ecology is the elaboration of Zen’s nondualistic thinking.” Barash also discussed how the environmental problems the public was then just becoming aware of resulted from the Western view of the dichotomy between humans and nature. The exploitation of nature as something external and separate from humans has had disastrous consequences in both ancient and modern times. A primary problem is that we behave in a way that we believe benefits ourselves at the expense of nature. This is true both at a collective level (jobs versus the environment) and an individual level (driving a car versus riding a bike). This perception

Journal

Conservation BiologyWiley

Published: Oct 16, 1997

There are no references for this article.