Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jobling (2001)
354
Bell (1998)
114
S. Refstie, T. Storebakken, G. Baeverfjord, A. Roem (2001)
Long-term protein and lipid growth of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed diets with partial replacement of fish meal by soy protein products at medium or high lipid levelAquaculture, 193
R. Rasmussen (2001)
Quality of farmed salmonids with emphasis on proximate composition, yield and sensory characteristicsAquaculture Research, 32
Storebakken (2002)
79
M. Aursand, B. Bleivik, J. Rainuzzo, Jörgensen Leif, V. Mohr (1994)
Lipid distribution and composition of commercially farmed atlantic salmon (salmosalar)Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 64
M. Jobling, B. Andreassen, A. Larsen, R. Olsen (2002)
Fat dynamics of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. smolt during early seawater growthAquaculture Research, 33
O. Einen, A. Roem (1997)
Dietary protein/energy ratios for Atlantic salmon in relation to fish size: growth, feed utilization and slaughter qualityAquaculture Nutrition, 3
E. Wathne (1995)
Strategies for directing slaughter quality of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with emphasis on diet composition and fat deposition
Tissue (fillet, viscera and carcass) distributions of fat were examined in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. (≈740→≈1400→≈2000 g) to test the hypothesis that the fillet becomes increasingly important as a fat depot when fish increase in size. The salmon were fed for 11 weeks on either a high‐fat feed (H: ≈39% fat) or a low‐fat feed (L: ≈28% fat), and half of the fish were then subjected to a dietary switch to create four feed treatments (HH, HL, LL and LH). Fillet fat concentration increased with the passage of time, and the fillet also represented an increasing percentage of the body mass (≈48.5→≈55→≈58.5%) as the fish increased in size. As a consequence, the fillet became increasingly important as a fat depot, containing ≈30% of the body fat in the small fish at the start of the experiment, and ≈50% in the fish sampled at the end of the trial. The proportion of fat localised in the viscera was little influenced by either fish size or feeding treatment, and was within the range of 19–25%, whereas the carcass held a decreasing percentage of the body fat stores as fish size increased. There was a highly significant negative correlation between the percentages of body fat found within the carcass (C) and fillet (F): F = 73.589–0.9285C (R2 = 0.973; n = 13). Although the fillet became more important as a fat depot as fish increased in size, the percentage of the body fat reserves found within this tissue appeared to plateau at 50–55%.
Aquaculture Research – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.