Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Absent‐mindedness in shops: Its incidence, correlates and consequences

Absent‐mindedness in shops: Its incidence, correlates and consequences This paper describes a questionnaire study of absent‐mindedness in shops, and an analysis of 166 letters written by 67 individuals who felt themselves to be wrongly accused of shoplifting. A total of 150 men and women were asked how often they had experienced each of 24 varieties of mental lapse while shopping. If they had not actually suffered a particular lapse, they were asked to judge its likelihood of occurrence. Approximately half of the sample also completed the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). Lapses carrying the risk of shop‐lifting accusations were reported as occurring far less frequently, and were judged as less likely, than either ‘embarrassing’ or ‘nuisance’ lapses. However, an examination of the circumstances leading up to accusations of shoplifting indicated that high risk lapses can occur when ill health, extreme preoccupation and distraction are combined with unwise supermarket practices. A positive and significant correlation was found between the CFQ and the Absent‐Mindedness in Shops Questionnaire (AMSQ). A factor analysis of the AMSQ revealed a very pervasive general factor, together with a risk appreciation factor. The findings supported the view that responses to both the CFQ and the AMSQ reflected characteristic differences in the management of some superordinate attentional control resource. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png British Journal of Clinical Psychology Wiley

Absent‐mindedness in shops: Its incidence, correlates and consequences

Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/absent-mindedness-in-shops-its-incidence-correlates-and-consequences-1GZXLB0Etq

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
1984 The British Psychological Society
ISSN
0144-6657
eISSN
2044-8260
DOI
10.1111/j.2044-8260.1984.tb00635.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper describes a questionnaire study of absent‐mindedness in shops, and an analysis of 166 letters written by 67 individuals who felt themselves to be wrongly accused of shoplifting. A total of 150 men and women were asked how often they had experienced each of 24 varieties of mental lapse while shopping. If they had not actually suffered a particular lapse, they were asked to judge its likelihood of occurrence. Approximately half of the sample also completed the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). Lapses carrying the risk of shop‐lifting accusations were reported as occurring far less frequently, and were judged as less likely, than either ‘embarrassing’ or ‘nuisance’ lapses. However, an examination of the circumstances leading up to accusations of shoplifting indicated that high risk lapses can occur when ill health, extreme preoccupation and distraction are combined with unwise supermarket practices. A positive and significant correlation was found between the CFQ and the Absent‐Mindedness in Shops Questionnaire (AMSQ). A factor analysis of the AMSQ revealed a very pervasive general factor, together with a risk appreciation factor. The findings supported the view that responses to both the CFQ and the AMSQ reflected characteristic differences in the management of some superordinate attentional control resource.

Journal

British Journal of Clinical Psychology – Wiley

Published: May 1, 1984

There are no references for this article.