Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/a-continuously-varying-parameter-model-of-downstream-hydraulic-0tB0igcjje
References (32)
-
Bofu Yu, M. Wolman (1987)
Some dynamic aspects of river geometryWater Resources Research, 23
-
J. Jones (1984)
A SPATIALLY-VARYING PARAMETER MODEL OF AFDC PARTICIPATION: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS USING THE EXPANSION METHOD*The Professional Geographer, 36
-
W. Osterkamp (1980)
Sediment-Morphology Relations of Alluvial Channels -
Meinhold (1983)
10.2307/2685871Am. Stat., 37
-
Blench T. (1952)
Regime theory for self‐formed sediment‐bearing channelsTrans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 117
-
C. Carlston (1969)
Downstream variations in the hydraulic geometry of streams; special emphasis on mean velocityAmerican Journal of Science, 267
-
David Belsley (1973)
On the Determination of Systematic Parameter Variation in the Linear Regression Model -
S. Schumm, R. Lichty (1965)
Time, space, and causality in geomorphologyAmerican Journal of Science, 263
-
W. Osterkamp, E. Hedman (1977)
Variation of width and discharge for natural high‐gradient stream channelsWater Resources Research, 13
-
D. Knighton (1984)
Fluvial forms and processes -
By Osterkamp, D. Peck (1982)
Perennial-streamflow characteristics related to channel geometry and sediment in Missouri River basin -
T. Blench (1951)
Closure of "Regime Theory for Self-Formed Sediment-Bearing Channels"Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 117
-
W. Osterkamp, L. Lane, G. Foster (1983)
An analytical treatment of channel-morphology relations -
Richard Meinhold, N. Singpurwalla (1983)
Understanding the Kalman FilterThe American Statistician, 37
-
S. Schumm (1960)
The shape of alluvial channels in relation to sediment type -
C. Embleton, K. Richards (1982)
Rivers: Form and Process in Alluvial Channels -
D. Duncan, S. Horn (1972)
Linear Dynamic Recursive Estimation from the Viewpoint of Regression AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 67
-
Casetti (1972)
10.1111/j.1538-4632.1972.tb00458.xGeogr. Anal., 4
-
Belsey (1980)
10.1002/0471725153 -
Paine Paine (1985)
Ergodic reasoning in geomorphology: Time for a review of the term?Prog. Phys. Geogr., 9
-
B. Rhoads (1990)
Hydrologic characteristics of a small desert mountain stream: implications for short-term magnitude and frequency of bedload transportJournal of Arid Environments, 18
-
Duncan (1972)
10.2307/2284643J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 67
-
M. Church, D. Mark (1980)
On size and scale in geomorphologyProgress in Physical Geography, 4
-
Park (1977)
10.1016/0022-1694(77)90103-2J. Hydrol., 33
-
Chris Park (1977)
World-wide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: An analysis and some observationsJournal of Hydrology, 33
-
M. Mosley (1981)
Semi-determinate hydraulic geometry of river channels, South Island, New ZealandEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 6
-
L. Leopold, T. Maddock (1953)
The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications -
G. Pickup, W. Rieger (1979)
A conceptual model of the relationship between channel characteristics and discharge, 4
-
T. Miller, L. Onesti (1979)
The relationship between channel shape and sediment characteristics in the channel perimeterGeological Society of America Bulletin, 90
-
Casetti Casetti (1972)
Generating models by the expansion method: Applications to geographic researchGeogr. Anal., 4
-
Montgomery (1982)
10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00604.x -
A. Paine (1985)
'Ergodic' reasoning in geomorphologyProgress in Physical Geography, 9
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1991 by the American Geophysical Union.
- ISSN
- 0043-1397
- eISSN
- 1944-7973
- DOI
- 10.1029/91WR01363
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Few studies have attempted to examine explicitly the factors that produce variation in hydraulic geometry parameters. A continuously varying parameter model of downstream hydraulic geometry is formulated to address this issue. Parameter variation is viewed as a function of channel sediment characteristics and flood magnitude. Results for the Missouri River basin show that these factors are strongly associated with variation in hydraulic geometry coefficients and exponents. The results also indicate that bivariate relationships are biased by these associations. The analysis yields site‐specific parameters that uniquely describe the relationship between active channel form and mean discharge at a particular location within the basin. The continuously varying parameter approach has several advantages: (1) it isolates the separate influences of each explanatory variable on each hydraulic geometry parameter, (2) it maintains the precision of parameter estimates by including the entire data set in the analysis, and (3) it allows testing of the conception that hydraulic geometry parameters vary continuously rather than discretely, yet permits analysis of discrete change through the use of dummy variables.
Journal
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 1991