Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Glover, M. Laguna (1997)
Tabu Search
B. Balcik, B. Beamon, K. Smilowitz (2008)
Last Mile Distribution in Humanitarian ReliefJournal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12
E. Zitzler, L. Thiele (1999)
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approachIEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 3
P. Hansen, N. Mladenović, José Andrés, Moreno Pérez (2003)
Variable Neighbourhood Search, 7
M. Basseur, Franck Seynhaeve, E. Talbi (2005)
Path Relinking in Pareto Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms
Olli Bräysy, M. Gendreau (2005)
Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows, Part I: Route Construction and Local Search AlgorithmsTransp. Sci., 39
M. Hodgson, G. Laporte, F. Semet (1998)
A Covering Tour Model for Planning Mobile Health Care Facilities in SuhumDistrict, GhamaJournal of Regional Science, 38
V. Angelis, M. Mecoli, Chris Nikoi, Giovanni Storchi (2007)
Multiperiod integrated routing and scheduling of World Food Programme cargo planes in AngolaComput. Oper. Res., 34
K. Doerner, Axel Focke, W. Gutjahr (2007)
Multicriteria tour planning for mobile healthcare facilities in a developing countryEur. J. Oper. Res., 179
M. Gendreau, G. Laporte, F. Semet (1997)
The Covering Tour ProblemOper. Res., 45
D. Goldberg, W. Shakespeare (2002)
Genetic Algorithms
A. Campbell, D. Vandenbussche, W. Hermann (2008)
Routing for Relief EffortsTransp. Sci., 42
N. Altay, W. Green (2006)
OR/MS research in disaster operations managementEur. J. Oper. Res., 175
K. Sörensen (2007)
Distance measures based on the edit distance for permutation-type representationsJournal of Heuristics, 13
W. Stirn
Katastrophenhilfe in Entwicklungsländern: Effizienzpotentiale der Deutschen Auslandshilfe
V. Khare, X. Yao, K. Deb (2003)
Performance Scaling of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms
Pamela Nolz, K. Doerner, W. Gutjahr, R. Hartl (2010)
A Bi-objective Metaheuristic for Disaster Relief Operation Planning
G. Barbarosoglu, L. Özdamar, A. Çevik (2002)
An interactive approach for hierarchical analysis of helicopter logistics in disaster relief operationsEur. J. Oper. Res., 140
P. Moscato (1989)
On Evolution, Search, Optimization, Genetic Algorithms and Martial Arts : Towards Memetic Algorithms
L. Özdamar, E. Ekinci, Beste Küçükyazici (2004)
Emergency Logistics Planning in Natural DisastersAnnals of Operations Research, 129
J. Holland (1975)
Adaptation in natural and artificial systems
K. Viswanath, S. Peeta (2003)
Multicommodity Maximal Covering Network Design Problem for Planning Critical Routes for Earthquake ResponseTransportation Research Record, 1857
M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, E. Zitzler (2006)
An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint methodEur. J. Oper. Res., 169
S. Ladd (1995)
Genetic algorithms in C
G. Kovács, K. Spens (2007)
Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operationsInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37
L. Wassenhove (2006)
Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gearJ. Oper. Res. Soc., 57
Wei Yi, L. Özdamar (2007)
A dynamic logistics coordination model for evacuation and support in disaster response activitiesEur. J. Oper. Res., 179
K. Deb, S. Agrawal, Amrit Pratap, T. Meyarivan (2002)
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-IIIEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present an operations research (OR) model for planning water distribution tours in disaster relief. Especially in situations after a disaster occurrence, characterized by instability and the immediate need of help, high‐quality decisions have to be made fast. For this reason, it is very useful if planning decisions can be alleviated by a decision support system (DSS) using an efficient multi‐objective metaheuristic as its algorithmic core. Design/methodology/approach – The paper develops a metaheuristic search technique based on evolutionary concepts for a real‐world extension of a multi‐objective covering tour problem. Findings – The proposed method supports decision makers in finding appropriate compromise solutions with respect to conflicting objectives (e.g. coverage and travel time). With this work, the authors want to reduce the gap between theory and practical applications. They apply OR methods to a real‐world application in the field of disaster relief operations planning. Research limitations/implications – The success of the proposed approach depends on the availability of reasonable and useful data. However, data generation in this context represents an upcoming discipline, especially under the circumstances of increasing threat by natural hazards. Practical implications – When the approach is integrated in a DSS, different scenarios can be investigated immediately and presented with a geographic information tool. The most appropriate solution for the decision makers can be realized. Originality/value – Heterogeneous transport modes and different road types were not considered so far in these types of problems.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 7, 2010
Keywords: Decision support systems; Aid agencies; Disasters; Operations management; Water supply
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.