Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Applying Bayesian ideas to the development of medical guidelines

Applying Bayesian ideas to the development of medical guidelines Measurements of the quality of health care, in particular the underuse and overuse of medical therapies and diagnostic tests, often involve employment of medical practice guidelines to assess the appropriateness of treatments. This paper presents a case study of a Bayesian analysis for the development of medical guidelines based on expert opinion, using ordinal categorical rater data. We develop guidelines for the use of coronary angiography following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for 890 clinical indications using statistical models fit to appropriateness ratings obtained from a nine‐member expert panel. The main foci of our analyses were on the estimation of an appropriateness score for each of the clinical indications, an associated measure of precision, and functions of the underlying score. We considered two classes of models that assume the ratings are either in the form of grouped normal data or are ungrouped variables arising from a normal distribution, while permitting rater effects and indication heterogeneity in both. We estimated models using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods and constructed indices quantifying appropriateness based on posterior probabilities of selected model parameters. We compared our model‐based approach to the standard approach currently employed in medical guideline development and found that the standard approach correctly identified 99 per cent of the appropriate indications while overestimating appropriateness 18 per cent of the time compared to our model‐based approach. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Statistics in Medicine Wiley

Applying Bayesian ideas to the development of medical guidelines

Download PDF
21 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/applying-bayesian-ideas-to-the-development-of-medical-guidelines-0jLEZ3GCuw

References (47)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN
0277-6715
eISSN
1097-0258
DOI
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990130)18:2<117::AID-SIM8>3.0.CO;2-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Measurements of the quality of health care, in particular the underuse and overuse of medical therapies and diagnostic tests, often involve employment of medical practice guidelines to assess the appropriateness of treatments. This paper presents a case study of a Bayesian analysis for the development of medical guidelines based on expert opinion, using ordinal categorical rater data. We develop guidelines for the use of coronary angiography following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for 890 clinical indications using statistical models fit to appropriateness ratings obtained from a nine‐member expert panel. The main foci of our analyses were on the estimation of an appropriateness score for each of the clinical indications, an associated measure of precision, and functions of the underlying score. We considered two classes of models that assume the ratings are either in the form of grouped normal data or are ungrouped variables arising from a normal distribution, while permitting rater effects and indication heterogeneity in both. We estimated models using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods and constructed indices quantifying appropriateness based on posterior probabilities of selected model parameters. We compared our model‐based approach to the standard approach currently employed in medical guideline development and found that the standard approach correctly identified 99 per cent of the appropriate indications while overestimating appropriateness 18 per cent of the time compared to our model‐based approach. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal

Statistics in Medicine – Wiley

Published: Jan 30, 1999

There are no references for this article.