Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Armstrong, W. Paterson (1981)
The Physics of GlaciersArctic and alpine research, 14
C. Neuzil (1986)
Groundwater Flow in Low‐Permeability EnvironmentsWater Resources Research, 22
R. Bryson, F. Hare (1974)
Climates of North America
R. Barry (1982)
Mountain weather and climate
C. Forster, L. Smith (1988)
Groundwater flow systems in mountainous terrain: 1. Numerical modeling techniqueWater Resources Research, 24
J. Ruffner (1978)
Climates of the States : National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration narrative summaries, tables, and maps for each state, with current tables of normals, 1941-1970, means and extremes to 1975 : overview of state climatologist programs
A. Woodbury, L. Smith (1985)
On the thermal effects of three‐dimensional groundwater flowJournal of Geophysical Research, 90
The modeling technique developed in paper l (Forster and Smith, this issue) of this two‐part study provides a quantitative means for assessing the impact of factors controlling groundwater flow systems in mountainous terrain. Conditions to be examined include surface topography (slope profile, relief, three‐dimensional form), geology (permeability and thermal conductivity), climate (available infiltration, presence and extent of alpine glaciers, surface temperature conditions), and regional heat flux. Modeling results indicate that water table elevation is a sensitive indicator of the factors controlling mountain flow systems. Under certain conditions, overestimating the bulk permeability of a mountain massif by a factor of 5 can lead to underestimates of the water table elevation in excess of 1000 m. Under the same conditions, rates of fluid flux may be overestimated by at least 60%. The infiltration rate, regional heat flux, and the presence of glaciers have important, but lesser impacts. High topographic relief amplifies the influence of surface topography and permeable fracture zones on patterns of groundwater flow and on the position of groundwater flow divides. Although computed water table elevations are sensitive to controlling factors, uncertainties inherent in resolving the magnitude of many of the controlling parameters will complicate efforts to constrain simulations using measured water table elevations.
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 1988
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.