Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Eden, Joseph Kinnar (1991)
Modeling Galatea : boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteeringJournal of Applied Psychology, 76
Scott Lester, B. Meglino, M. Korsgaard (2002)
The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work GroupsAcademy of Management Journal, 45
K. Spink (1990)
Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12
Marilyn Gist, T. Mitchell (1992)
Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and MalleabilityAcademy of Management Review, 17
Ho Ho (1991)
Relational orientation and methodological individualismBulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 26/27
Gist Gist, Stevens Stevens, Bavetta Bavetta (1991)
The influence of self‐efficacy and training condition on retention of learningPersonnel Psychology, 44
Cathy Durham, D. Knight, E. Locke (1997)
Effects of Leader Role, Team-Set Goal Difficulty, Efficacy, and Tactics on Team EffectivenessOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72
Glen Whyte (1998)
Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 73 2/3
M. Campion, Gina Medsker, A. Higgs (1993)
RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPSPersonnel Psychology, 46
Dana Lindsley, Daniel Brass, James Thomas (1995)
Efficacy-Performing Spirals: A Multilevel PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 20
Ken Smith, Ken Smith, Judy Olian, H. Sims, Douglas O'Bannon, J. Scully (1994)
Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and CommunicationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 39
E. Locke, Elizabeth Zubritzky, Cynthia Lee, P. Bobko (1984)
Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69
Hodges Hodges, Carron Carron (1992)
Collective efficacy and group performanceInternational Journal of Sport Psychology, 23
S. Cohen, Gerald Ledford (1994)
The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-ExperimentHuman Relations, 47
P. Earley (1989)
Social Loafing and Collectivism: A Comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China.Administrative Science Quarterly, 34
H. Markus, Elissa Wurf (1987)
THE DYNAMIC SELF-CONCEPT: A Social Psychological PerspectiveAnnual Review of Psychology, 38
H. Markus, S. Kitayama (1991)
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98
Marilyn Gist, Catherine Schwoerer, B. Rosen (1989)
EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAININGJournal of Applied Psychology, 74
Marilyn Gist (1989)
THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING METHOD ON SELF‐EFFICACY AND IDEA GENERATION AMONG MANAGERSPersonnel Psychology, 42
H. Witkin, J. Berry (1975)
Psychological Differentiation in Cross-Cultural PerspectiveJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6
C. Gibson (1999)
Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and CulturesAcademy of Management Journal, 42
S. Cohen, Gerald Ledford, G. Spreitzer (1996)
A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team EffectivenessHuman Relations, 49
J. Wagner (1995)
Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in GroupsAcademy of Management Journal, 38
N. Kerr (1989)
Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25
Earley Earley (1989)
Social loafing and collectivismAdministrative Science Quarterly, 34
M. Erez, A. Somech (1996)
Is Group Productivity Loss the Rule or The Exception? Effects of Culture and Group-Based MotivationAcademy of Management Journal, 39
P. Earley (1993)
East Meets West Meets Mideast: Further Explorations Of Collectivistic and Individualistic Work GroupsAcademy of Management Journal, 36
Gregory Prussia, A. Kinicki (1996)
A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 81
Richard Guzzo, Paul Yost, R. Campbell, G. Shea (1993)
Potency in groups: articulating a construct.The British journal of social psychology, 32 ( Pt 1)
M. Burke, Lisa Finkelstein, Michelle Dusig (1999)
On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater AgreementOrganizational Research Methods, 2
Barry Staw (1984)
Organizational behavior: a review and reformulation of the field's outcome variables.Annual review of psychology, 35
Shea Shea, Guzzo Guzzo (1987)
Group effectiveness: What really mattersSloan Management Review, 28
R. Wood, E. Locke (1987)
The Relation of Self-Efficacy and Grade Goals to Academic PerformanceEducational and Psychological Measurement, 47
Gibson Gibson, Randel Randel, Earley Earley (2000)
Understanding group‐efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methodsGroup and Organization Management, 25
Cynthia Lee, P. Bobko (1994)
Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
G. Mikula, Birgit Petri, Norbert Tanzer (1990)
What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice.European Journal of Social Psychology, 20
C. Gibson, Amy Randel, P. Earley (2000)
Understanding Group EfficacyGroup & Organization Management, 25
R. Tipton, E. Worthington (1984)
The measurement of generalized self-efficacy: a study of construct validity.Journal of personality assessment, 48 5
E. Weldon, L. Weingart (1993)
Group goals and group performanceBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 32
To examine the power of group confidence, the nomological network of group potency (generalized confidence) and group efficacy (task‐specific confidence) is detailed. These constructs are embedded in a causal model including both antecedent and consequent variables. Results obtained within a collective cultural context suggest that group cohesion and group norms are antecedents to group confidence, and task performance and satisfaction are consequences. The empirical effects for group potency were robust, but those for group efficacy were surprisingly nonsignificant. This study shows that generalized confidence (group potency) is a stronger predictor of group outcomes than is group efficacy when the group members are unfamiliar with the complex tasks at hand. Implications for future research and group training are noted.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.