Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Blinder (1989)
Pay, Participation, and Productivity, 8
F. Damanpour (1991)
Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and ModeratorsAcademy of Management Journal, 34
R. Parthasarthy, S. Sethi (1993)
Relating strategy and structure to flexible automation: A test of fit and performance implicationsSouthern Medical Journal, 14
Lewin Lewin (1947)
“Frontiers in Group Dynamics.”Human Relations, 1
J. Brockner, S. Grover, Thomas Reed, Rocki-Lee Dewitt, Michael O'Malley (1987)
Survivors' Reactions to Layoffs: We Get By with a Little Help for Our Friends.Administrative Science Quarterly, 32
M. Tushman, W. Newman, E. Romanelli (1986)
Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational EvolutionCalifornia Management Review, 29
J. Arthur (1992)
The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel MinimillsIndustrial & Labor Relations Review, 45
MacDuffie MacDuffie, Sethuraman Sethuraman, Marshall Marshall (1996)
“Product Variety and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from the International Assembly Plant Study.”Management Science, 42
Paul Milgrom, John Roberts (1995)
Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturingJournal of Accounting and Economics, 19
P. Osterman (1994)
How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it?Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 47
Michele Bolton (1993)
Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?Organization Science, 4
S. Mezias, Maryann Glynn (1993)
The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolutionSouthern Medical Journal, 14
Mezias Mezias, Mary Mary (1993)
“The Three Faces of Corporate Renewal: Institution, Revolution, and Evolution.”Strategic Management Journal, 14
M. Aoki (2013)
Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese FirmJournal of Economic Literature, 28
Barry Staw (1976)
Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16
J. March (1991)
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
John Krafcik (1988)
Comparative analysis of performance indicators at world auto assembly plants
S. Lippman, R. Rumelt (1982)
Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under CompetitionThe Bell Journal of Economics, 13
Mark Huselid (1995)
The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial PerformanceERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes (Topic)
John Macduffie (1996)
Organizational Influences on Process Quality Improvement: Shop-Floor Problem-Solving in Auto Assembly Plants
M. Tushman (1990)
Introduction: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 35
K. Mcneil, James Thompson (1971)
The Regeneration of Social OrganizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 36
Dewar Dewar, Jane Jane (1986)
“The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis.”Management Analysis, 32
Levitt Levitt, James James (1988)
“Organizational Learning.”Annual Review of Sociology, 14
H. White (1980)
A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 48
MacDuffie MacDuffie, Thomas Thomas (1995)
“Do U.S. Firms Invest Less in Human Resources? Determinants of Training in the World Auto Industry.”Industrial Relations, 34
John Macduffie (1995)
Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto IndustryIndustrial & Labor Relations Review, 48
E. Burack, Marvin Burack, Diane Miller, Kathleen Morgan (1994)
New Paradigm Approaches in Strategic Human Resource ManagementGroup & Organization Management, 19
M. Tushman, Philip Anderson (1986)
Technological Discontinuities and Organizational EnvironmentsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 31
Parthasarthy Parthasarthy, Prakash Sethi Prakash Sethi (1993)
“Relating Strategy and Structure to Flexible Automation: A Test of Fit and Performance Implications.”Strategic Management Journal, 14
S. Graves (1996)
A multiechelon inventory model with fixed replenishment intervalsManagement Science, 42
This article provides a theoretical framework for understanding why high‐involvement work practices are adopted more rapidly by some organizations than others. Drawing on evolutionary economics and innovation literature, we identify three key drivers: (1) the level of complementary human resource practices and technology; (2) performance achieved with previous practices; and (3) factors that alter the cost of introducing new practices. Empirical analyses of a unique longitudinal data set of forty‐three automobile assembly plants worldwide provide support for hypotheses about complementary HR practices (but not complementary technologies) and partial support for hypotheses about past performance and factors that alter adoption costs.
Industrial Relations – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.