Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Measurement of Species Diversity

The Measurement of Species Diversity Inspired significantly by the provocative papers of MacArthur (34, 35, 38) and Hutchinson (22), ecologists over the past twenty years have devoted considerable energy to the explanation of patterns of diversity in ecologic systems. Despite considerable interest, however, no generally accepted definition of diversity has emerged. "Diversity per se does not exist," was the contention of Hurlbert (20),who suggested abandoning the term because of the multiplicity of meanings and interpre­ tations attached to it. MacArthur (37) also considered the term had outlived its usefulness,and Eberhardt (10),Austin (2),and McIntosh (40) all complained of the lack of a definition. Eberhardt considered that diversity "mostly suggests a consider­ able confusion of concepts, definitions,models, and measures (or indices)." If diver­ sity is to continue to play a productive role in ecological investigations,agreement is needed on the definitions of the many constituent concepts included in its current application. At the community level of synthesis many phenomena are complex and open to multiple interpretation. Consequently, many authors have suggested diversity in­ dices appropriate for their own studies,no one of which can be considered a priori correct for general application (12,19,20,32,40). Diversity,in essence,has always been defined by the indices used to measure it,and this has http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Annual Reviews

The Measurement of Species Diversity

Loading next page...
 
/lp/annual-reviews/the-measurement-of-species-diversity-0G9h0A8E4f

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Annual Reviews
Copyright
Copyright 1974 Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
Subject
Review Articles
ISSN
0066-4162
DOI
10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001441
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Inspired significantly by the provocative papers of MacArthur (34, 35, 38) and Hutchinson (22), ecologists over the past twenty years have devoted considerable energy to the explanation of patterns of diversity in ecologic systems. Despite considerable interest, however, no generally accepted definition of diversity has emerged. "Diversity per se does not exist," was the contention of Hurlbert (20),who suggested abandoning the term because of the multiplicity of meanings and interpre­ tations attached to it. MacArthur (37) also considered the term had outlived its usefulness,and Eberhardt (10),Austin (2),and McIntosh (40) all complained of the lack of a definition. Eberhardt considered that diversity "mostly suggests a consider­ able confusion of concepts, definitions,models, and measures (or indices)." If diver­ sity is to continue to play a productive role in ecological investigations,agreement is needed on the definitions of the many constituent concepts included in its current application. At the community level of synthesis many phenomena are complex and open to multiple interpretation. Consequently, many authors have suggested diversity in­ dices appropriate for their own studies,no one of which can be considered a priori correct for general application (12,19,20,32,40). Diversity,in essence,has always been defined by the indices used to measure it,and this has

Journal

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and SystematicsAnnual Reviews

Published: Nov 1, 1974

There are no references for this article.