Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Dess Dess (1987)
Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: Competitors in a fragmented industryStrategic Management Journal, 8
A. Thomas (1988)
Does leadership make a difference to organizational performanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 33
D. Beard, Gregory Dess (1981)
Corporate-Level Strategy, Business-Level Strategy, and Firm PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 24
B. Fisher (1970)
Decision emergence: Phases in group decision‐makingCommunication Monographs, 37
P. H.Grinyer, D. Norburn (1975)
Planning for Existing Markets: Perceptions of Executives and Financial Performance, 138
K. Andrews (1971)
The Concept of Corporate Strategy
K. Weick (1969)
The social psychology of organizing
Schwenk Schwenk (1982)
Dialectical inquiry in strategic decision making: A comment on the continuing debateStrategic Management Journal, 3
J. Fredrickson (1984)
The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes: Extension, Observations, Future DirectionsAcademy of Management Journal, 27
K. Harrigan (1983)
Research Methodologies for Contingency Approaches to Business StrategyAcademy of Management Review, 8
Barry Staw, Lance Sandelands, J. Dutton (1981)
Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly, 26
Schwenk Schwenk (1989)
A meta‐analysis on the comparative effectiveness of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiryStrategic Management Journal, 10
Charles Schwenk (1982)
Dialectical inquiry in strategic decision‐making: A comment on the continuing debateSouthern Medical Journal, 3
R. Cosier (1982)
Methods for improving the strategic decisnio: Dialectic versus the Devil's advocateSouthern Medical Journal, 3
J. Fredrickson (1986)
The Strategic Decision Process and Organizational StructureAcademy of Management Review, 11
J. Prescott (1986)
Environments as Moderators of the Relationship Between Strategy and PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 29
Gregory Dess, Nancy Origer (1987)
Environment, Structure, and Consensus in Strategy Formulation: A Conceptual IntegrationAcademy of Management Review, 12
D. Schweiger, William Sandberg, James Ragan (1986)
Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and ConsensusAcademy of Management Journal, 29
L. Bourgeois (1980)
Performance and consensusSouthern Medical Journal, 1
Joan Woodward (1966)
Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice
J. Kimberly (1976)
Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: a review, critique, and proposalAdministrative Science Quarterly, 21
I. Mitroff (1982)
Talking past one's colleagues in matters of policySouthern Medical Journal, 3
Jay Galbraith (1973)
Designing Complex Organizations
D. Pugh, D. Hickson, C. Hinings, C. Turner (1969)
The Context of Organization StructuresAdministrative Science Quarterly, 14
J. Sullivan, I. Nonaka (1986)
The Application of Organizational Learning Theory to Japanese and American ManagementJournal of International Business Studies, 17
Dalton McFarland, R. Stogdill (1960)
Individual Behavior and Group AchievementRevue Francaise De Sociologie, 1
Schweiger Schweiger, Sandberg Sandberg (1989)
The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision makingStrategic Management Journal, 10
S. Lieberson, James O'Connor (1972)
Leadership and organizational performance: a study of large corporations.American sociological review, 37 2
Cosier Cosier (1982)
Methods for improving the strategic decision: Dialectic versus the devil's advocateStrategic Management Journal, 3
I. Nonaka (1988)
Toward Middle-Up-Down Management: Accelerating Information CreationSloan Management Review, 29
L. Bourgeois (1985)
STRATEGIC GOALS, PERCEIVED UNCERTAINTY, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN VOLATILE ENVIRONMENTSAcademy of Management Journal, 28
R. Cosier, Charles Schwenk (1990)
Agreement and thinking alike: ingredients for poor decisionsThe Executive, 4
Mintzberg Mintzberg (1978)
Patterns in strategy formulationManagement Science, 24
A. Gero (1985)
Conflict Avoidance in Consensual Decision ProcessesSmall Group Research, 16
Donald Zagoria, E. Vogel (1979)
Japan as number one
Gregory Dess, D. Beard (1984)
Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.Administrative Science Quarterly, 29
Fisher Fisher (1970)
Decision emergence: Phases in group decision makingSpeech Monographs, 37
D. Hambrick (1981)
Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams.Administrative science quarterly, 26 2
Henry Mintzberg, Duru Raisinghani, A. Theoret (1976)
The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision ProcessesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 21
C. Nemeth (1986)
Differential contributions of majority and minority influencePsychological Review, 93
R. Calkins, D. Braybrooke, C. Lindblom (1964)
A Strategy of Decision, Policy Evaluation as a Social Process.Administrative Science Quarterly, 10
E. Torrance (1957)
Group Decision-Making and DisagreementSocial Forces, 35
J. Fredrickson, T. Mitchell (1984)
Strategic Decision Processes: Comprehensiveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable EnvironmentAcademy of Management Journal, 27
B. Hedberg, P. Nystrom, W. Starbuck (1976)
Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization
Gregory Dess, Barbara Keats (1987)
Environmental Assessment and Organizational Performance: An Exploratory Field Study., 1987
Rodney Clark (1979)
The Japanese Company
B. Bernstein, G. Allison, Philip Zelikow (1971)
Essence of Decision
Bourgeois Bourgeois (1980)
Performance and consensusStrategic Management Journal, 1
D. Tjosvold, R. Field (1985)
Effect of Concurrence, Controversy, and Consensus on Group Decision MakingJournal of Social Psychology, 125
Charles Schwenk (1989)
RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMUNICATIONS A META-ANALYSIS ON THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DEVIL'S ADVOCACY AND DIALECTICAL INQUIRY
C. Schoonhoven (1981)
Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.".Administrative science quarterly, 26 3
G. Huber, Michael O'Connell, L. Cummings (1975)
Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: Effects of Information and StructureAcademy of Management Journal, 18
David Brodwin, L. Bourgeois (1984)
Five Steps to Strategic ActionCalifornia Management Review, 26
W. Wagner, J. Pfeffer, C. O'Reilly (1984)
Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups.Administrative Science Quarterly, 29
Charles Schwenk, R. Cosier (1980)
Effects of the expert, devil's advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26
Mark Smith, Michael White (1987)
Strategy, CEO Specialization, and SuccessionAdministrative Science Quarterly, 32
Henry Mintzberg (1978)
Patterns in Strategy FormationInternational Studies of Management & Organization, 9
D. Schweiger, William Sandberg (1989)
The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision‐makingSouthern Medical Journal, 10
Grinyer Grinyer, Norburn Norburn (1975)
Planning for existing markets: Perceptions of executivesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, 138
Mitroff Mitroff (1982)
Talking past one's colleagues in matters of policyStrategic Management Journal, 3
D. Hambrick, P. Mason (1984)
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top ManagersAcademy of Management Review, 9
J. Sullivan (1983)
A critique of Theory Z.Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 8 1
Gregory Dess (1987)
Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: Competitors in a fragmented industrySouthern Medical Journal, 8
(1980)
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
J. McCann (1980)
Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism
The results of recent consensus‐performance research have been equivocal. Substantive and methodological issues are examined to suggest reasons for this equivocality. Top management team composition, structure, and decision processes are proposed as antecedents to the consensus‐performance relationship. An argument is developed for a curvilinear aggregate consensus‐performance relationship, moderated by environmental dynamism. A model and associated propositions are advanced to further descriptive and normative theory.
Strategic Management Journal – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.