Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Cannabinoids Modulate Synaptic Strength and Plasticity at Glutamatergic Synapses of Rat Prefrontal Cortex Pyramidal Neurons

Cannabinoids Modulate Synaptic Strength and Plasticity at Glutamatergic Synapses of Rat... Abstract Cannabinoids receptors have been reported to modulate synaptic transmission in many structures of the CNS, but yet little is known about their role in the prefrontal cortex where type I cannabinoid receptor (CB-1) are expressed. In this study, we tested first the acute effects of selective agonists and antagonist of CB-1 on glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in slices of rat prefrontal cortex (PFC). EPSCs were evoked in patch-clamped layer V pyramidal cells by stimulation of layer V afferents. Monosynaptic EPSCs were strongly depressed by bath application (1 μM) of the cannabinoid receptors agonists WIN55212-2 (−50.4 ± 8.8%) and CP55940 (−42.4 ± 10.9%). The CB-1 antagonist SR141716A reversed these effects. Unexpectedly, SR141716A alone produced a significant increase of glutamatergic synaptic transmission (+46.9 ± 11.2%), which could be partly reversed by WIN55212-2. In the presence of strontium in the bath, the frequency but not the amplitude of asynchronous synaptic events evoked in layer V pyramidal cells by stimulating layer V afferents, was markedly decreased (−54.2 ± 8%), indicating a presynaptic site of action of cannabinoids at these synapses. Tetanic stimulation (100 pulses at 100 Hz, 4 trains) induced in control condition, no changes ( n = 7/18), long-term depression (LTD; n = 6/18), or long-term potentiation (LTP; n = 5/18) of monosynaptic EPSCs evoked by stimulation of layer V afferents. When tetanus was applied in the presence of WIN 55,212-2 or SR141716-A (1 μM) in the bath, the proportion of “nonplastic” cells were not significantly changed ( n = 7/15 in both cases). For the plastic ones ( n = 8 in both cases), WIN 55,212-2 strongly favored LTD ( n = 7/8) at the apparent expense of LTP ( n = 1/8), whereas the opposite effect was observed with SR141716-A (7/8 LTP; 1/8 LTD). These results demonstrate that cannabinoids influence glutamatergic synaptic transmission and plasticity in the PFC of rodent. Footnotes Address for reprint requests: N. Auclair, Laboratoire de Neurobiologie et Neuropharmacologie du Developpement, Institut des Neurosciences-boite n°8-Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI, 7, quai Saint Bernard, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “ advertisement ” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Copyright © 2000 The American Physiological Society http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Neurophysiology The American Physiological Society

Cannabinoids Modulate Synaptic Strength and Plasticity at Glutamatergic Synapses of Rat Prefrontal Cortex Pyramidal Neurons

Loading next page...
 
/lp/the-american-physiological-society/cannabinoids-modulate-synaptic-strength-and-plasticity-at-06ME5tG0Oc

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
The American Physiological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 the American Physiological Society
ISSN
0022-3077
eISSN
1522-1598
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Cannabinoids receptors have been reported to modulate synaptic transmission in many structures of the CNS, but yet little is known about their role in the prefrontal cortex where type I cannabinoid receptor (CB-1) are expressed. In this study, we tested first the acute effects of selective agonists and antagonist of CB-1 on glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in slices of rat prefrontal cortex (PFC). EPSCs were evoked in patch-clamped layer V pyramidal cells by stimulation of layer V afferents. Monosynaptic EPSCs were strongly depressed by bath application (1 μM) of the cannabinoid receptors agonists WIN55212-2 (−50.4 ± 8.8%) and CP55940 (−42.4 ± 10.9%). The CB-1 antagonist SR141716A reversed these effects. Unexpectedly, SR141716A alone produced a significant increase of glutamatergic synaptic transmission (+46.9 ± 11.2%), which could be partly reversed by WIN55212-2. In the presence of strontium in the bath, the frequency but not the amplitude of asynchronous synaptic events evoked in layer V pyramidal cells by stimulating layer V afferents, was markedly decreased (−54.2 ± 8%), indicating a presynaptic site of action of cannabinoids at these synapses. Tetanic stimulation (100 pulses at 100 Hz, 4 trains) induced in control condition, no changes ( n = 7/18), long-term depression (LTD; n = 6/18), or long-term potentiation (LTP; n = 5/18) of monosynaptic EPSCs evoked by stimulation of layer V afferents. When tetanus was applied in the presence of WIN 55,212-2 or SR141716-A (1 μM) in the bath, the proportion of “nonplastic” cells were not significantly changed ( n = 7/15 in both cases). For the plastic ones ( n = 8 in both cases), WIN 55,212-2 strongly favored LTD ( n = 7/8) at the apparent expense of LTP ( n = 1/8), whereas the opposite effect was observed with SR141716-A (7/8 LTP; 1/8 LTD). These results demonstrate that cannabinoids influence glutamatergic synaptic transmission and plasticity in the PFC of rodent. Footnotes Address for reprint requests: N. Auclair, Laboratoire de Neurobiologie et Neuropharmacologie du Developpement, Institut des Neurosciences-boite n°8-Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI, 7, quai Saint Bernard, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “ advertisement ” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Copyright © 2000 The American Physiological Society

Journal

Journal of NeurophysiologyThe American Physiological Society

Published: Jun 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.