Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Poppo Poppo, Zenger Zenger (2002)
Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?Strategic Management Journal, 23
V. Choudhury, R. Sabherwal (2003)
Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development ProjectsInf. Syst. Res., 14
Hansen Hansen (2002)
Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companiesOrganization Science, 13
C. Lance (1988)
Residual Centering, Exploratory and Confirmatory Moderator Analysis, and Decomposition of Effects in Path Models Containing InteractionsApplied Psychological Measurement, 12
Samer Faraj, L. Sproull (2000)
Coordinating Expertise in Software Development TeamsManagement Science, 46
Karim Karim (2006)
Modularity in organizational structure: the reconfiguration of internally developed and acquired business unitsStrategic Management Journal, 27
Tiwana Tiwana, Keil Keil (2007)
Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliancesStrategic Management Journal, 28
M. Lindell, D. Whitney (2001)
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 1
W. Ouchi, M. Maguire (1975)
Organizational Control: Two Functions.Administrative Science Quarterly, 20
A. Tiwana, M. Keil (2007)
Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliancesSouthern Medical Journal, 28
S. Nambisan (2002)
Complementary Product Integration by High-Technology New Ventures: The Role of Initial Technology StrategyManag. Sci., 48
(2001)
anchors: Much smaller—Much larger}: How would you compare this project to other IT projects completed by your company
Sosa Sosa, Eppinger Eppinger, Rowles Rowles (2004)
The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product developmentManagement Science, 50
Hoetker Hoetker (2006)
Do modular products lead to modular organizations?Strategic Management Journal, 27
N. Malhotra, Sung Kim, Ashutosh Patil (2006)
Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past ResearchManag. Sci., 52
Nicolay Worren, K. Moore, Pablo Cardona (2002)
Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industrySouthern Medical Journal, 23
G. Hoetker (2006)
Do Modular Products Lead to Modular OrganizationsSouthern Medical Journal, 27
Nicolaj Siggelkow (2002)
Misperceiving Interactions Among Complements and Substitutes: Organizational ConsequencesManag. Sci., 48
R. Bagozzi, Youjae Yi, L. Phillips (1991)
Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational ResearchAdministrative Science Quarterly, 36
R. Sanchez (1995)
Strategic flexibility in product competitionStrategic Management Journal, 16
G. Hoetker, A. Swaminathan, W. Mitchell (2007)
Modularity and the Impact of Buyer - Supplier Relationships on the Survival of SuppliersManag. Sci., 53
Smith Smith, Eppinger Eppinger (1997)
Identifying controlling features of engineering design iterationManagement Science, 43
L. Kirsch, V. Sambamurthy, Dong-Gil Ko, Russell Purvis (2002)
Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the ClientManag. Sci., 48
M. Mulvenna, F. Zambonelli, K. Curran, C. Nugent (2005)
Knowledge Networks
Hans Mjoen, Stephen Tallman (1997)
Control and Performance in International Joint VenturesOrganization Science, 8
R. Sanchez, Joseph Mahoney (1996)
Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization designIEEE Engineering Management Review, 25
A. Prencipe, S. Brusoni (2005)
Making Design Rules: A Multi-Domain Perspective, 17
L. Poppo, Todd Zenger (2002)
Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or ComplementsSouthern Medical Journal, 23
S. Karim (2006)
Modularity in Organizational Structure: The Reconfiguration of Internally Developed and Acquired Business UnitsSouthern Medical Journal, 27
Sloan School of Management Working Paper On-line Supplement To: the Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development
Morten Hansen (2002)
Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit CompaniesOrgan. Sci., 13
D. Parnas (1972)
On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modulesCommunications of the ACM, 15
Sendil Ethiraj, P. Kale, M. Krishnan, Jitendra Singh (2005)
Where Do Capabilities Come from and How Do They Matter? A Study in the Software Services IndustryIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
Melissa Schilling (2000)
Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product ModularityAcademy of Management Review, 25
J. Jaccard, R. Turrisi, C. Wan (1992)
Interaction effects in multiple regression
(2005)
The Great Giveaway
Worren Worren, Moore Moore, Cardona Cardona (2002)
Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: a study of the home appliance industryStrategic Management Journal, 23
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
Sanchez Sanchez, Mahoney Mahoney (1996)
Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product organization and designStrategic Management Journal, 17
H. Barki, S. Rivard, Jean Talbot (2001)
An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk ManagementJournal of Management Information Systems, 17
J. Oxley, Rachelle Sampson (2003)
The Scope and Governance of International R&D AlliancesIO: Productivity
Although control is presumed to be necessary to curb opportunism, its implementation in alliances can be costly and challenging. Paradoxically, some contemporary firms have counterintuitively developed successful alliances without extensive formal control. A widespread but untested assertion that might help reconcile this contradiction is that technological modularity reduces the need for alliance control. The objective of this study is to develop and test this assertion. Using data from 120 software outsourcing alliances, we show that, process control, outcome control, and modularity independently enhance alliance performance. However modularity and control are imperfect substitutes: modularity lowers the influence of process control but not of outcome control on alliance performance. Our theoretical development and empirical testing of the interactions of alliance control with modularity has significant implications for strategy theory and practice, which are also discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Strategic Management Journal – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.