Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Myerson (1979)
Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining ProblemEconometrica, 47
Q. Cheng, Terry Warfield, Minlei Ye (2004)
Equity Incentives and Earnings ManagementJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26
R. Shrieves, P. Gao (2002)
Earnings Management and Executive Compensation: A Case of Overdose of Option and Underdose of Salary?Labor: Personnel Economics eJournal
(2006)
They Didn't Earn It—They Should Return It
(2004)
Qwest Trial Shows That Rank Is No Protection.
Michael Mussa, S. Rosen (1978)
Monopoly and product qualityJournal of Economic Theory, 18
S. Shavell (1979)
Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent RelationshipThe Bell Journal of Economics, 10
Merle Erickson, Michelle Hanlon, Edward Kenan-Flagler (2004)
Is There a Link Between Executive Compensation and Accounting Fraud ?
C. Alexander, M. Cohen (1999)
Why Do Corporations Become Criminals? Ownership, Hidden Actions, and Crime as an Agency CostCriminal Law & Procedure eJournal
G. Bonanno
Economics of Uncertainty and Information
K. Crocker, J. Morgan (1998)
Is Honesty the Best Policy? Curtailing Insurance Fraud through Optimal Incentive ContractsJournal of Political Economy, 106
Jeffrey Lacker, J. Weinberg (1989)
Optimal Contracts under Costly State FalsificationJournal of Political Economy, 97
Bengt Holmstrom (1979)
Moral Hazard and ObservabilityThe Bell Journal of Economics, 10
(2005)
Corporate Tax Evasion with Agency Costs
(2005)
Giving Back the Bonus
Cheng Cheng, Warfield Warfield (2005)
Equity Incentives and Earnings ManagementAccounting Review, 80
J. Mirrlees (1999)
The Theory of Moral Hazard and Unobservable Behaviour: Part IThe Review of Economic Studies, 66
(2004)
Execs Agree to Pay FPL Group The Miami Herald
Merle Erickson, Michelle Hanlon, Edward Maydew (2006)
Is There a Link between Executive Equity Incentives and Accounting Fraud?Corporate Finance: Governance
Danner Danner (2004)
Execs Agree to Pay FPL GroupMiami Herald
I. Jewitt (1988)
Justifying the First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent ProblemsEconometrica, 56
(2004)
Battle Intensifies Over Executive Bonuses.
(2002)
How to Fix Corporate Governance
R. Dye (1988)
EARNINGS MANAGEMENT IN AN OVERLAPPING GENERATIONS MODELJournal of Accounting Research, 26
B. Ke (2001)
Why Do CEOS of Publicly Traded Firms Prefer Reporting Small Increases in Earnings and Long Duration of Consecutive Earnings Increases?SPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
R. Guesnerie, J. Laffont (1984)
A complete solution to a class of principal-agent problems with an application to the control of a self-managed firmJournal of Public Economics, 25
Kong‐Pin Chen, C. Chu (2002)
Internal Control vs External Manipulation: A Model of Corporate Income Tax EvasionThe RAND Journal of Economics, 36
(2005)
Nortel Sues 3 Ex-Officers Over Big Bonuses
R. Myerson (1982)
Optimal coordination mechanisms in generalized principal–agent problemsJournal of Mathematical Economics, 10
Shane Johnson, Harley Ryan, Yisong Tian (2008)
Managerial Incentives and Corporate Fraud: The Sources of Incentives MatterConsumer Financial Fraud eJournal
C. Mezzetti (2004)
Mechanism Design with Interdependent Valuations: EfficiencyEconometrica, 72
(2004)
Settlement over Bonuses Paid Before Merger Failed
Shane Johnson, Harley Ryan, Yisong Tian, Hao Li, Stephen Smith, Andrew Christie, Bill Lane, Joseph Legoria, A. Lei, Timothy Louwers, Kelley Pace (2003)
Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud
Michelle Hanlon, Lillian Mills, J. Slemrod (2005)
An Empirical Examination of Corporate Tax NoncomplianceThe Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan Research Paper Series
(2004)
Owens Vows to Clean Up Nortel's Books: 'I Didn't Seek This Job, But I Love It
Patricia Dechow, Richard Sloan, A. Sweeney (1996)
Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC*Contemporary Accounting Research, 13
Thomas Gresik, D. Nelson (1994)
Incentive compatible regulation of a foreign-owned subsidiaryJournal of International Economics, 36
W. Rogerson (1985)
THE FIRST-ORDER APPROACH TO PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEMSEconometrica, 53
This article examines managerial compensation in an environment where managers may take a hidden action that affects the actual earnings of the firm. When realized, these earnings constitute hidden information that is privately observed by the manager, who may expend resources to generate an inflated earnings report. We characterize the optimal managerial compensation contract in this setting, and demonstrate that contracts contingent on reported earnings cannot provide managers with the incentive both to maximize profits and to report those profits honestly. As a result, some degree of earnings management must be tolerated as a necessary part of an efficient agreement.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.