Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Asubonteng, K. McCleary, J. Swan (1996)
SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service qualityJournal of Services Marketing, 10
John Martilla, J. James (1977)
Importance-Performance AnalysisJournal of Marketing, 41
W. Deming (1982)
Out of the Crisis
J. Carlzon (1987)
Moments of Truth
P. Patterson, Richard Spreng (1997)
Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business‐to‐business, services context: an empirical examinationInternational Journal of Service Industry Management, 8
S. Aldridge, J. Rowley (1998)
Measuring customer satisfaction in higher educationQuality Assurance in Education, 6
M.G. Angur
Service quality measurements in a developing economy: SERVQUAL versus SERVPERF
W. Sasser (1974)
The Management of Service Operations., 1974
Frances Hill (1995)
Managing service quality in higher education: the role of the student as primary consumerQuality Assurance in Education, 3
B. Schneider, D. Bowen (1995)
Winning the service game
I. Price, Fides Matzdorf, Louise Smith, Helen Agahi (2003)
The impact of facilities on student choice of universityFacilities, 21
L. Galloway (1998)
Quality perceptions of internal and external customers: a case study in educational administrationThe Tqm Magazine, 10
Susan Pariseau, J. McDaniel (1997)
Assessing service quality in schools of businessInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 14
Y. Hill, L. Lomas, J. Macgregor (2003)
Students’ perceptions of quality in higher educationQuality Assurance in Education, 11
M. Sohail, N. Shaikh (2004)
Quest for Excellence in Business Education: A Study of Student Impressions of Service QualityCognitive Social Science eJournal
C. Coles (2002)
Variability of Student Ratings of Accouting Teaching: Evidence from a Scottish Business SchoolThe International Journal of Management Education, 2
M. Angur (1998)
Service Quality Measurements in a Developing Economy
K. Devinder, B. Datta (2003)
A study of the effect of perceived lecture quality on post‐lecture intentionsWork Study, 52
M. O'Neill (2003)
The influence of time on student perceptions of service quality: The need for longitudinal measuresJournal of Educational Administration, 41
T. Jones (1996)
Why Satisfied Customers DefectJournal of Management in Engineering, 12
R. James, Gabrielle Baldwin, Craig Mclnnis (1999)
Which university?: the factors influencing the choices of prospective undergraduates
Maureen Tam (2002)
Measuring the effect of higher education on university studentsQuality Assurance in Education, 10
A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, L. Berry (1988)
SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.Journal of Retailing, 64
J. Rowley (2003)
Designing student feedback questionnairesQuality Assurance in Education, 11
F. Buttle (1996)
SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agendaEuropean Journal of Marketing, 30
J. Rowley (2003)
Retention: rhetoric or realistic agendas for the future of higher educationInternational Journal of Educational Management, 17
W. Dillon, T. Madden, Neil Firtle (1992)
Essentials of Marketing Research
W. Dillon, Ajith Kumar, Melinda Borrero (1993)
Capturing Individual Differences in Paired Comparisons: An Extended BTL Model Incorporating Descriptor VariablesJournal of Marketing Research, 30
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on the design and use of a questionnaire to measure student satisfaction at Liverpool John Moores University's Faculty of Business and Law. Design/methodology/approach – The paper utilised the concept of the service‐product bundle to design the survey questionnaire and then used SPSS and Quadrant Analysis to analyse the results to determine which aspects of the University's services were most important and the degree to which they satisfied the students. Findings – The most important aspects were those associated with teaching and learning, while the least important were those associated with the physical facilities. Practical implications – The concept of the service‐product bundle is a valid and reliable tool for the design of a satisfaction survey and segments a University's service offering in such a way as to allow management to target resources at those areas that are perceived to be low satisfaction and high importance. The questionnaire can be utilised in most education establishments. Originality/value – Utilising the concept service‐product bundle places responsibility for questionnaire content and design firmly on the service provider rather than the user.
Quality Assurance in Education – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2006
Keywords: Service levels; Higher education; Students; Surveys; United Kingdom
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.