Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Dambreville, J. Cadre (2002)
Search game for a moving target with dynamically generated informationsProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997), 1
Ryusuke Hohzaki (2006)
Search allocation gameEur. J. Oper. Res., 172
P. Morse, G. Kimball (1952)
Methods of Operations Research
K. Kikuta (1991)
A SEARCH GAME WITH TRAVELING COSTJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 34
V. Baston, F. Bostock (1989)
A one-dimensional helicopter-submarine gameNaval Research Logistics, 36
Teruhisa Nakai (1988)
SEARCH MODELS WITH CONTINUOUS EFFORT UNDER VARIOUS CRITERIAJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 31
n searchers
A2) The target goes along a preplanned path. We denote a set of feasible paths by (cid:3)
Ryusuke Hohzaki, A. Washburn (2003)
AN APPROXIMATION FOR A CONTINUOUS DATUM SEARCH GAME WITH ENERGY CONSTRAINTJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 46
A. Garnaev (1993)
A remark on a helicopter and submarine gameNaval Research Logistics, 40
K. Iida, Ryusuke Hohzaki, S. Furui (1996)
A SEARCH GAME FOR A MOBILE TARGET WITH THE CONDITIONALLY DETERMINISTIC MOTION DEFINED BY PATHSJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 39
R. Myerson (1991)
Game theory - Analysis of Conflict
M. Dufwenberg (2011)
Game theory.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2 2
Ryusuke Hohzaki, K. Iida, Toru Komiya (2002)
DISCRETE SEARCH ALLOCATION GAME WITH ENERGY CONSTRAINTSJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 45
(1978)
The search number of a connected graph
James Eagle, A. Washburn (1991)
Cumulative search‐evasion gamesNaval Research Logistics, 38
(1999)
“A solution for a two-person zero-sum game with a concave payoff function,”
with probability p S ∪ T = 1 − ( 1 − p S )( 1 − p T )
(1964)
“A sequentially compounded search game,”
R. Morris (1962)
STUDIES IN SEARCH FOR A CONSCIOUS EVADER
Teruhisa Nakai (1986)
A SEQUENTIAL EVASION-SEARCH GAME WITH A GOALJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 29
Koopman Koopman (1957)
The theory of search III: the optimum distribution of searching effortOper Res, 5
Ryusuke Hohzaki, K. Iida (1998)
A SEARCH GAME WITH REWARD CRITERIONJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 41
A search space consists of a discrete geographic space K = { 1, . . . , K } and a discrete time space T = { 1, . . . , T } , and K × T represents the search space
B. Koopman (1957)
The Theory of SearchOperations Research, 5
Ryusuke Hohzaki (2007)
A MULTI-STAGE SEARCH ALLOCATION GAME WITH THE PAYOFF OF DETECTION PROBABILITYJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 50
T. Parsons (1978)
Pursuit-evasion in a graph
A. Washburn (1980)
Search-Evasion Game in a Fixed RegionOper. Res., 28
ii) The function becomes infinite for perfect detection probability p S = 1. If a coalition can detect the target without any mistake, it is thought to be all-mighty and its utility is infinite
Ryusuke Hohzaki, A. Washburn (2001)
The Diesel Submarine Flaming Datum ProblemMilitary Operations Research, 6
R. Buehler, G. Chartrand, Y. Alavi, D. Goldsmith, Linda Lesniak-Foster, D. Lick (1983)
The Theory and Applications of Graphs.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78
S. Alpern, S. Gal (2002)
The theory of search games and rendezvous, 55
J. Danskin (1968)
A Helicopter Versus Submarine Search GameOper. Res., 16
(1964)
Theory of games: Techniquea and applications
J. O'Rourke (1987)
Art gallery theorems and algorithms
K. Iida, Ryusuke Hohzaki, Kenjyo Sato (1994)
HIDE-AND-SEAERCH GAME WITH THE RISK CRITERIONJournal of The Operations Research Society of Japan, 37
Search theory originates from the military research efforts of WWII. Most researchers of that period modeled their search games in noncooperative games, where players are enemies or compete against each other. In this article, we deal with a cooperative search game, where multiple searchers behave cooperatively. First we describe several search problems and discuss the possibility of a coalition or cooperation among searchers. For the cooperative search game, we define a function named quasi‐characteristic function, which gives us a criterion similar to the so‐called characteristic function in the general coalition game with transferable utility. The search operation includes a kind of randomness with respect to whether the searchers can detect a target and get the value of the target. We also propose a methodology to divide the obtained target value among members of the coalition taking account of the randomness. As a concrete problem of the cooperative search game, we take the so‐called search allocation game, where searchers distribute their searching resources to detect a target in a cooperative way and the target moves in a search space to evade the searchers. Lastly, we discuss the core of the cooperative search allocation game. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2009
Naval Research Logistics: An International Journal – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.