In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Katja Venborg Pedersen and coworkers  present an interesting study evaluating the influence of unilateral painful visceral disease on sensory and morphometric changes in the referred pain area. Twenty-four patients with unilateral pain from kidney stone disease were studied before and after endoscopic percutaneous kidney stone surgery. These patients had suffered from the stone disease in median 7 months, and 9 of the patients had experienced 10 or more episodes of painful stone colics. Sensory assessments included electrical and mechanical stimuli, and morphometric analyses were by CT-and ultrasound-scans. The authors did not observe any differences between the ipsilateral and contralateral flanks, in regard to pain threshold, temporal summation, or tissue volume. This is a well-performed study that contradicts results of several comparable studies. The authors also deserve much credit for presenting skillfully, balanced arguments for this discrepancy. We will shortly return to this issue.1Are negative studies unsexy, not interesting and not worthy of publication?Based on the many negative findings of the study, a provocative discussion is offered: should studies with non-significant findings be published or not? Thirteen comparisons were made in this study, 10 of these were non-significant. Studies rejecting
Scandinavian Journal of Pain – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 29, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera