Reliability of pressure pain threshold testing (PPT) in healthy pain free young adults

Reliability of pressure pain threshold testing (PPT) in healthy pain free young adults Quantitative sensory assessments of musculoskeletal pain using pressure algometry require, as for assessing neuropathic pain, two different disciplines where the first is standardised stimulation of deep-tissue nociceptors, and the second is standardised quantification of the evoked pain sensation. Both of those disciplines can introduce variability and hence hamper the reliability of the method.1Reliability, specificity, and sensitivity of quantitative sensory testing (QST)Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is being applied more and more frequently in clinical studies for profiling pain patients or for profiling the mode-of-action of new/existing analgesics. Advanced QST profiling can provide a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in pain transduction, transmission, and perception under normal and pathophysiological conditions and provide the basis for mechanism-based diagnosis, prevention, and management of pain. Before such tests can be applied in clinical trials, the reliability, specificity, and sensitivity have to be known. Furthermore, QST techniques by nature rely on subjective responses from the person being tested which is introducing uncertainties and variation. However, some of the techniques, e.g. hand help pressure algometry, also rely on how the experimenter/rater is doing the tests.2Documenting variability caused by the person doing pressure pain measurementsValidating such variability, although important, is often not prioritised as it takes http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Scandinavian Journal of Pain de Gruyter

Reliability of pressure pain threshold testing (PPT) in healthy pain free young adults

Loading next page...
 
/lp/degruyter/reliability-of-pressure-pain-threshold-testing-ppt-in-healthy-pain-9GcKut00ic
Publisher
De Gruyter
Copyright
© 2015 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain
ISSN
1877-8860
eISSN
1877-8879
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.06.002
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Quantitative sensory assessments of musculoskeletal pain using pressure algometry require, as for assessing neuropathic pain, two different disciplines where the first is standardised stimulation of deep-tissue nociceptors, and the second is standardised quantification of the evoked pain sensation. Both of those disciplines can introduce variability and hence hamper the reliability of the method.1Reliability, specificity, and sensitivity of quantitative sensory testing (QST)Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is being applied more and more frequently in clinical studies for profiling pain patients or for profiling the mode-of-action of new/existing analgesics. Advanced QST profiling can provide a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in pain transduction, transmission, and perception under normal and pathophysiological conditions and provide the basis for mechanism-based diagnosis, prevention, and management of pain. Before such tests can be applied in clinical trials, the reliability, specificity, and sensitivity have to be known. Furthermore, QST techniques by nature rely on subjective responses from the person being tested which is introducing uncertainties and variation. However, some of the techniques, e.g. hand help pressure algometry, also rely on how the experimenter/rater is doing the tests.2Documenting variability caused by the person doing pressure pain measurementsValidating such variability, although important, is often not prioritised as it takes

Journal

Scandinavian Journal of Painde Gruyter

Published: Dec 29, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Access to DeepDyve database
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off