This issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain contains a review by Heikkilaa and co-workers on postoperative pain documentation . Their systematic search and appraisal yielded 10 out of 2209 articles which they integrated into a qualitative review. The primary finding is sobering: all 10 studies reported that the quality of postoperative pain documentation did not meet acceptable standards.The authors are to be commended for undertaking this project and their efforts to report in detail the outcomes of the studies analyzed. However, some caveats apply when interpreting their results. Most of the studies were retrospective and included important weaknesses such as lack of specification of the sample size (in one study) and unclear duration of auditing and number of investigators (in half the studies). Five studies were conducted in the USA, four in different countries outside Europe and only one in Europe (Sweden); five of the studies were published by the same group, making the generalizability of the results questionable. As expected, there was a large heterogeneity in the auditing tools used in the different studies, making data synthesis a challenging task. Nonetheless, despite the limitations, the Heikkilaa and co-workers’ review gives opportunity for reflection and raises important questions.1Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 29, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera