New knowledge reduces risk of damage to spinal cord from spinal haematoma after epidural- or spinal-analgesia and from spinal cord stimulator leads

New knowledge reduces risk of damage to spinal cord from spinal haematoma after epidural- or... In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain Michael Lagerkranser publishes two connected papers in which he analyses risk factors and management of 166 cases of bleeding into the spinal canal (spinal haematoma (SH)), rare complications that can damage the spinal cord, from epidural- or spinal-analgesia (central neuraxial blocks (CNB)) and from spinal cord stimulator (SCS) lead-electrodes [1,2]. These 166 case stories, published between 1994 and 2015, appeared in MEDLINE- or EMBASE-databases.1Why should we pay attention to case stories?We know that there are many sources of publication bias in case-stories where patients suffered major complications or death: we seldom see publications of cases where the author(s) clearly made a unforgivable blunder, more often the authors publish their case-story when rare complications happened in spite of apparently perfect handling before and after the complication occurred. Still, such case reports, but only when reported honestly and in enough detail to make it possible to analyse risk factors and management, can be the only way to learn critical aspects of rare events or rare but serious complications [3].2Randomized and controlled study (RCT) of rare events is hardly possibleSo, why can we not do large trials in which we can handle patients http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Scandinavian Journal of Pain de Gruyter

New knowledge reduces risk of damage to spinal cord from spinal haematoma after epidural- or spinal-analgesia and from spinal cord stimulator leads

Loading next page...
 
/lp/degruyter/new-knowledge-reduces-risk-of-damage-to-spinal-cord-from-spinal-pNchcGCksg
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2017 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain
ISSN
1877-8860
eISSN
1877-8879
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.01.011
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain Michael Lagerkranser publishes two connected papers in which he analyses risk factors and management of 166 cases of bleeding into the spinal canal (spinal haematoma (SH)), rare complications that can damage the spinal cord, from epidural- or spinal-analgesia (central neuraxial blocks (CNB)) and from spinal cord stimulator (SCS) lead-electrodes [1,2]. These 166 case stories, published between 1994 and 2015, appeared in MEDLINE- or EMBASE-databases.1Why should we pay attention to case stories?We know that there are many sources of publication bias in case-stories where patients suffered major complications or death: we seldom see publications of cases where the author(s) clearly made a unforgivable blunder, more often the authors publish their case-story when rare complications happened in spite of apparently perfect handling before and after the complication occurred. Still, such case reports, but only when reported honestly and in enough detail to make it possible to analyse risk factors and management, can be the only way to learn critical aspects of rare events or rare but serious complications [3].2Randomized and controlled study (RCT) of rare events is hardly possibleSo, why can we not do large trials in which we can handle patients

Journal

Scandinavian Journal of Painde Gruyter

Published: Apr 1, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off