Intraoral QST – Mission impossible or not?

Intraoral QST – Mission impossible or not? In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Moana-Filho and colleagues report on multifactorial assessment of measurement errors related to the reliability of intraoral Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) [1]. First of all, the authors should be applauded for their attempt to move intraoral QST forward by looking at intra-examiner reliability between four examiners in a comprehensive (and impressive) statistical model. The main contribution is that intraoral QST, indeed, is feasible and now with a slightly better understanding of key performance parameters such as intraexaminer reliability with four examiners. The authors argue that the relatively small number of test participants, and the choices only to look at a limited number of a standardized QST modalities and a few test regions are minor concerns and I will tend to agree. Why? Because overall the study will stand as another confirmatory piece of evidence in favour of the clinical applicability of intraoral QST. And that is important to highlight – and to publish.1Intraoral Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) in the Nordic countries and IASPQST has a long tradition and in particular Scandinavian researchers have made important contributions to the field (e.g. [2]). Most noticeably, also intraoral and extraoral QST has been developed http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Scandinavian Journal of Pain de Gruyter

Intraoral QST – Mission impossible or not?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/degruyter/intraoral-qst-mission-impossible-or-not-ZcTR9pvUOQ
Publisher
De Gruyter
Copyright
© 2017 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain
ISSN
1877-8860
eISSN
1877-8879
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.04.066
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Moana-Filho and colleagues report on multifactorial assessment of measurement errors related to the reliability of intraoral Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) [1]. First of all, the authors should be applauded for their attempt to move intraoral QST forward by looking at intra-examiner reliability between four examiners in a comprehensive (and impressive) statistical model. The main contribution is that intraoral QST, indeed, is feasible and now with a slightly better understanding of key performance parameters such as intraexaminer reliability with four examiners. The authors argue that the relatively small number of test participants, and the choices only to look at a limited number of a standardized QST modalities and a few test regions are minor concerns and I will tend to agree. Why? Because overall the study will stand as another confirmatory piece of evidence in favour of the clinical applicability of intraoral QST. And that is important to highlight – and to publish.1Intraoral Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) in the Nordic countries and IASPQST has a long tradition and in particular Scandinavian researchers have made important contributions to the field (e.g. [2]). Most noticeably, also intraoral and extraoral QST has been developed

Journal

Scandinavian Journal of Painde Gruyter

Published: Dec 29, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off