Fifty years on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain-intensity is still good for acute pain. But multidimensional assessment is needed for chronic pain

Fifty years on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain-intensity is still good for acute pain.... In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain David Dorfman and his co-authors focus on limitations of changes in pain-intensity as outcome measure of management of patients with chronic pain [1].1Multidimensionality of chronic pain makes pain intensity inadequate as sole outcome metric of chronic pain managementThe Dorfman et al. paper is one of several recent publications questioning the usefulness of pain-intensity as an only measurement in chronic pain. Thus, Jane Ballantyne and Mark Sullivan late last year (2015) in the New England Journal of Medicine asked whether intensity of chronic pain is the wrong metric [2] and again this year (2016) in PAIN they state that it is not necessary to reduce pain-intensity in order to treat chronic pain well [3]. Fayers et al. [4] on behalf of the European Palliative Care Research Collaboration focus on the differences in reports of pain intensity and pain interference among chronic pain patients and palliative care patients in pain. In 2015 in the journal Quality of Life Research Cooket al. [5] call for establishing a common metric for self-reported pain by linking scales for pain interference with SF-36 bodily pain subscale.2VAS – the Visual Analogue Scale: after 50 years there is http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Scandinavian Journal of Pain de Gruyter

Fifty years on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain-intensity is still good for acute pain. But multidimensional assessment is needed for chronic pain

Loading next page...
 
/lp/degruyter/fifty-years-on-the-visual-analogue-scale-vas-for-pain-intensity-is-MV4FD9QFLH
Publisher
De Gruyter
Copyright
© 2016 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain
ISSN
1877-8860
eISSN
1877-8879
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.02.004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain David Dorfman and his co-authors focus on limitations of changes in pain-intensity as outcome measure of management of patients with chronic pain [1].1Multidimensionality of chronic pain makes pain intensity inadequate as sole outcome metric of chronic pain managementThe Dorfman et al. paper is one of several recent publications questioning the usefulness of pain-intensity as an only measurement in chronic pain. Thus, Jane Ballantyne and Mark Sullivan late last year (2015) in the New England Journal of Medicine asked whether intensity of chronic pain is the wrong metric [2] and again this year (2016) in PAIN they state that it is not necessary to reduce pain-intensity in order to treat chronic pain well [3]. Fayers et al. [4] on behalf of the European Palliative Care Research Collaboration focus on the differences in reports of pain intensity and pain interference among chronic pain patients and palliative care patients in pain. In 2015 in the journal Quality of Life Research Cooket al. [5] call for establishing a common metric for self-reported pain by linking scales for pain interference with SF-36 bodily pain subscale.2VAS – the Visual Analogue Scale: after 50 years there is

Journal

Scandinavian Journal of Painde Gruyter

Published: Dec 29, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial