Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/degruyter/das-doppelperfekt-theorie-und-empirie-Of2zh98JN0
References (4)
-
D. Barr, R. Levy, Christoph Scheepers, Harry Tily (2013)
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.Journal of memory and language, 68 3
-
Andreas Ammann (2007)
The fate of ‘redundant’ verbal forms – Double perfect constructions in the languages of Europe, 60
-
Ellen Brandner, Martin Salzmann, G. Schaden (2015)
Zur Syntax und Semantik des doppelten Perfekts aus alemannischer Sicht -
Helga Gese (2013)
Another passive that isn’t one
- Publisher
- de Gruyter
- Copyright
- ©2018 Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
- ISSN
- 1613-3706
- eISSN
- 1613-3706
- DOI
- 10.1515/zfs-2018-0003
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
AbstractThe article concentrates on the German double perfect forms and tries to find an answer to the following question: is it possible to show that – contrary to traditional assumptions – the German double perfect is a systematical and therefore acceptable verbal form of German? First, the question will be substantiated by four experiments and will get an empirical answer. Secondly, a syntactic and semantic analysis of the double forms will be proposed and the empirical data will be discussed in view of this proposal.
Journal
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft – de Gruyter
Published: Jun 26, 2018