Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
B u d de, Zu Jesaja 1--5 quite like that of any other people. The early Hebrew may have been a monolatrist rather than a monotheist. But at Iris best he was no less than a monolatrist, with a profound conviction that when his fathers had been nothing but a rabble of slaves in an alien land, a God who was different from the 'near relationf deities of other peoples had delivered them and entered into covenant relationship with them. He might for a time continue to speak of God anthropomorphically, he might for a time continue to call his children by such names äs Abijah and Ahijah; but in such religious circles äs those that gave birth to the monarchy men knew in their hearts that there was none like Yahweh among the gods, and still less any that was like him among men. We must conclude that however exalted above his brethren the king might be, his place was on the human rather than on the divine side of reality. [Completed 1. January 1931.] Von Karl Budde in Marburg. (Marburg a. L., Renthof 17.) IV. Kap. 3, 16--4, . Das ganze herrliche Stück fußt auf der
Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 1932
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.