Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
I.ABTEILUNG TZETZES ON THUCYDIDES B. B A L D W I N / C A L G A R Y " , , . , . , ' , . ; * 3 , , , , , . This metrical scholium1 on Thucydides is in its violent language typical both of Tzetzes and of Byzantine polemic in general.2 At the level of low comedy, all students of Thucydides should find it diverting. 3 Analysis will show it to be a characteristical]y Byzantine melange of orthodox critical opinion decked out in sometimes odcl language. In a recent and rare4 discussion, R. Scott5 thinks that Tzetzes may have got his complaints from Dionysius of Halicarnassus. That Dionysius is one of Tzetzes' sources can One of many; others are on (parenthetic references are by the pages of Hude's edition of the scholia on Thucydides): l. 113 (83); i. 231 (89-90); 2. 102 (161-162); 3. 61 (201-202); 4. 8 (230); 5. 12 (293); 5. 14 (294); 5. 19 (298); 6. 2 (329); 6. 4 (33°)· Other scholia in iambic or political verse, carrying no name but evidently Tzetzean, can be found in Hude 50-1, 69, 98, 146, 163, 164, 166, 175,
Byzantinische Zeitschrift – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 1982
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.