INTRODUCTION What follows is a critical exposition of theories which interpret the joke as a mediation, or bisociation, occurring between two realms of meaning. The the- orists concerned - Bergson, Freud, Koestler, the Bateson 'school' of paradox theorists, Milner, and Douglas -- do not recognize that their works share this central point. This article maps out the domain of the theoretical interpretation of jokes. To interpret the joke as a bisociation occurring between divergent realms of meaning has many implications. In reviewing each theory we shall draw out the following points listed below which comprise the argument of this article: (1) By defining joking, the theorist creates a domain in which joking can occur. In doing so the theorist has created a model of society within which the joke as a social form operates and is contained. (2) Jokes or the act of joking arises out of the perception of the presence of two realms of meaning. As such, the joke constitutes a third realm, but because of its causal dependence on one or both of the two realms, it cannot be studied independently. (3) To locate the manifestation of jokes as arising from the comprehension of the
Semiotica - Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 1976
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera