Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Three Shafiʿites in Search of Water: The Indulgence of Tayammum and its Rigorous Preconditions

Three Shafiʿites in Search of Water: The Indulgence of Tayammum and its Rigorous Preconditions The great turn-of-the-century Hungarian orientalist, Ignaz Goldziher , found two related aspects of the religion he spent his life studying especially disagreeable: (1) “the soul-destroying pedantry of the jurists of Islam” whose “quibbling discriminations” and “dreary exegetical trifling” proved “detrimental to the inwardness of religion”; and (2) the inclination among those same “perverters of the law” to “think up contingencies that will never arise” and entertain “far-fetched legal cases, casuistic constructs quite independent of the real world” as they indulge in “the boldest and most reckless flights of fantasy.” Goldziher objected, in short, to what he saw as the dual plague of hair-splitting and theoretical sophistry afflicting the classical works of Islamic jurisprudence. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Der Islam de Gruyter

Three Shafiʿites in Search of Water: The Indulgence of Tayammum and its Rigorous Preconditions

Der Islam , Volume 82 (2) – Dec 12, 2005

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/three-shafi-ites-in-search-of-water-the-indulgence-of-tayammum-and-its-3e3AcsSWGO

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
ISSN
0021-1818
eISSN
1613-0928
DOI
10.1515/islm.2005.82.2.291
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The great turn-of-the-century Hungarian orientalist, Ignaz Goldziher , found two related aspects of the religion he spent his life studying especially disagreeable: (1) “the soul-destroying pedantry of the jurists of Islam” whose “quibbling discriminations” and “dreary exegetical trifling” proved “detrimental to the inwardness of religion”; and (2) the inclination among those same “perverters of the law” to “think up contingencies that will never arise” and entertain “far-fetched legal cases, casuistic constructs quite independent of the real world” as they indulge in “the boldest and most reckless flights of fantasy.” Goldziher objected, in short, to what he saw as the dual plague of hair-splitting and theoretical sophistry afflicting the classical works of Islamic jurisprudence.

Journal

Der Islamde Gruyter

Published: Dec 12, 2005

There are no references for this article.