Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
SummaryThis article discusses the Streisand effect in Right to be forgotten. Since this is a highly undesirable phenomenon, the article seeks to answer questions that reveal its frequency and the chance of its manifestation, thus answering the questions of how common the Streisand effect in right to be forgotten is; and it seeks and analyzes the variables that affect the chance of the Streisand effect. To find answers, the article draws on court decisions and also uses the insights of authors working on similar topics. Thus, each variable is justified and shown in a specific real case. The article concludes with a look at the possible increase in the Streisand effect in the future.
European Studies – de Gruyter
Published: Aug 1, 2022
Keywords: Right to be forgotten; Streisand effect; Data protection; Mario Costeja Gonzáles; European Court of Human Rights
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.