Information on atomic damage in Hiroshima and Nagasaki äs reported in the Japanese national daily, the Asahi Shimbun, during the months of August and September 1945 was (1) censored by the Japanese authorities (7-14 August 1945), (2) virtually free from censorship (15 August-18 September 1945), and (3) censored by the Occupation authorities (19 September 1945-31 October 1949). The censorship and reportage of atomic damage under these different conditions show how, during the period of Japanese censorship,censors minimized the bombs'damage, stressed thepossibility of taking counter\ · measures against future attacks, and focused on the contradiction between the espoused values of the Allies, justice and humanity, and the inhumanity of the atomic attacks. During the time reporters were free from censorship they continued to stress the inhumanity of the attacks, criticized the Japanese authorities, and highlighted the perspectives of the bombs'victims. The Occupation censors reduced the quantity and perverted the quality of Information on the atomic damage by (1) restricting the publication of material critical of the United States, (2) denying after-effects from nuclear exposure, and (3) blurrmg the victims 'perspectives on the atomic bombings. Introduction In the summer of 1945 a number of the leading scientists on the Manhattan
Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 1988
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera