On the structure of punchlines

On the structure of punchlines Jokes are to be viewed äs pieces of oral literature. They should not be analyzed only in terms of the reaction of people to them. Their infernal structure is a legitimate topicfor research. Here (i) they arefirst divided according to their structure, whether they consist of onet two, or more "pulses." Then (H) the punchlines are subjected to afeature-analysis, what logical devices are used to make them soundfunny. Great tragedy is more emotional, and consequently less intellectual, than great humour. Quoted, out of context, from Mikes (1954: 12). The scope of the inquiry: jokes In this study I mainly examine jokes9 thus excluding quips, paradoxes, parodies, saures, and other manifestations of humor. This is not to be construed äs an assumption that these do not operate along the same line äs jokes. This remains to be seen. Jokes are almost exclusively used for methodological reasons: a fairly homogeneous corpus should serve äs the input of a consistent study. Extensions, comparisons with other classes of humor should be set aside for a later stage. However, I may quote quips and riddles occasionally when they illustrate a point I want to make more concisely, hence more efficiently than the longer http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png HUMOR de Gruyter

On the structure of punchlines

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/on-the-structure-of-punchlines-dzyCUeUSXT
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Jokes are to be viewed äs pieces of oral literature. They should not be analyzed only in terms of the reaction of people to them. Their infernal structure is a legitimate topicfor research. Here (i) they arefirst divided according to their structure, whether they consist of onet two, or more "pulses." Then (H) the punchlines are subjected to afeature-analysis, what logical devices are used to make them soundfunny. Great tragedy is more emotional, and consequently less intellectual, than great humour. Quoted, out of context, from Mikes (1954: 12). The scope of the inquiry: jokes In this study I mainly examine jokes9 thus excluding quips, paradoxes, parodies, saures, and other manifestations of humor. This is not to be construed äs an assumption that these do not operate along the same line äs jokes. This remains to be seen. Jokes are almost exclusively used for methodological reasons: a fairly homogeneous corpus should serve äs the input of a consistent study. Extensions, comparisons with other classes of humor should be set aside for a later stage. However, I may quote quips and riddles occasionally when they illustrate a point I want to make more concisely, hence more efficiently than the longer

Journal

HUMORde Gruyter

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off