Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Vijver (2010)
The Irish beef case: Competition Authority v Beef Industry Development Society and Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats (C- 209/07), European Court of Justice.
Josef Drexl, Laurence Idot, J. Monéger (2009)
Economic Theory and Competition Law - The second ASCOLA workshop on comparative competition law
“ Resale Price Maintenance in E . U . Competition Law : Thoughts in Relation to the Vertical Restraints Review Procedure
V. Korah (2010)
Book Review: Competition Law of the European Community, by Van Bael & Bellis. 5th edn (Kluwer Law International and Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2010)World Competition
A. Gerbrandy (2010)
Case C-8/08, T-Mobile Netherlands BV, KPN Mobile NV, Orange Nederland NV, Vodafone Libertel NV v. Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit, JudgCommon Market Law Review
Josef Drexl, Laurence Idot, J. Monéger (2009)
Economic Theory and Competition Law
Alison Jones (2010)
The Journey toward an Effects-Based Approach under Article 101 TFEU—The Case of Hardcore RestraintsThe Antitrust Bulletin, 55
Nikolaos Vettas (2010)
Developments in Vertical AgreementsThe Antitrust Bulletin, 55
L. Kjølbye (2011)
Escaping Effects Analysis: The Commission’s New Approach to Restrictions by ObjectAntitrust Chronicle, 2
(2009)
Annual Report 2007 - 2009 “ Beware of legal privilege ? ! Dutch de minimis exemption for hardcore infringements in line with EU law
Petra Linsmeier, Moritz Lichtenegger (2004)
The German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf holds that hardcore restrictions are not per se appreciable if the relevant market share is below 1% (Tschechisches Bier)
Daivis Švirinas (2010)
The Peculiarities of the Assessment of the Use of Recommended Resale Prices under Article 81 of the European Community TreatySocietal Studies, 1
On the Potential to Apply De Minimis Exemption for Agreements Containing Hardcore Restraints: European Union Practice The article analyzes the possibility to apply de minimis exemption for agreements containing hardcore restraints. The statements are derived from analyses of scientific literature, relevant legislation, and the practice of courts and authorities responsible for competition maintenance. Current European Union legislation excludes agreements containing hardcore restraints from applying de minimis exemption. The early practice of the European Court of Justice (hereinafter - ECJ) and the newest national courts' (e.g. Spain) decisions do not reflect this position. Furthermore, in 2010 the Netherlands broadened the application of de minimis exemption. The article approaches a wide range of possibilities rather than the dogmatic practice of de minimis exemption. Besides the analysis of relevant jurisprudence, the article also assesses competition law specialists' opinions and possible solutions that proceed from the current situation.
Baltic Journal of Law & Politics – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.