Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Abstract The paper seeks to show that there is more to Antiochus’ moral psychology than has been appreciated in previous studies. Section I) deals with the apparent evidence on Antiochus’ psychological dualism in Cicero’s Academic Books (I.38–9), arguing that this report of Old Academic doctrine actually sits poorly with Antiochus’ reconstruction as expounded in De finibus V. Section II) in turn focuses on Fin. V itself, arguing that the theory emerging here represents an ingenious combination of both Stoic and Aristotelian elements, one that does not sit comfortably with the psychological dualism/monism contrast, as this is mostly construed in recent discussions.
Rhizomata – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.