Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Narrating the unspeakable. Person marking and focalization in Nabokov's short story ‘Signs and Symbols’

Narrating the unspeakable. Person marking and focalization in Nabokov's short story ‘Signs and... Abstract This article investigates the interaction of person marking and focalization in the short story ‘Signs and Symbols’ (first published 1948, The New Yorker ) by Russian-American author Vladimir Nabokov. This story has been studied extensively for its symbolism, its metafictional aspect, and its narrative structure. However, researchers have consequently ignored its most striking linguistic features: the almost exclusive use of pronouns in referring to the main characters and their characterization solely through lexical expressions focusing on outward appearances. This article offers a cognitive-stylistic analysis of these linguistic features in order to explain why many readers of ‘Signs and Symbols’ report a feeling of uncanniness while reading. Drawing on insights both from empirical linguistics and literary studies, the article aims to explain the role of pronominal expressions and deictic descriptions in reader's theme-construction and affective response to the text. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Literary Semantics de Gruyter

Narrating the unspeakable. Person marking and focalization in Nabokov's short story ‘Signs and Symbols’

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/narrating-the-unspeakable-person-marking-and-focalization-in-nabokov-s-Z09UEScjRE

References (24)

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the
ISSN
0341-7638
eISSN
1613-3838
DOI
10.1515/jls-2014-0007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the interaction of person marking and focalization in the short story ‘Signs and Symbols’ (first published 1948, The New Yorker ) by Russian-American author Vladimir Nabokov. This story has been studied extensively for its symbolism, its metafictional aspect, and its narrative structure. However, researchers have consequently ignored its most striking linguistic features: the almost exclusive use of pronouns in referring to the main characters and their characterization solely through lexical expressions focusing on outward appearances. This article offers a cognitive-stylistic analysis of these linguistic features in order to explain why many readers of ‘Signs and Symbols’ report a feeling of uncanniness while reading. Drawing on insights both from empirical linguistics and literary studies, the article aims to explain the role of pronominal expressions and deictic descriptions in reader's theme-construction and affective response to the text.

Journal

Journal of Literary Semanticsde Gruyter

Published: Sep 1, 2014

There are no references for this article.