Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Microsoft excel expert certification MO-201: results, analysis and key tips to succeed

Microsoft excel expert certification MO-201: results, analysis and key tips to succeed AbstractMicrosoft Excel skills are imperative in today’s competitive market and the skill is highly demanded by businesses. The MOS Excel Expert Certification (MO-201) validates the competency that one should build to meet employers’ expectations. The paper addresses the statistical mean rank difference in four skill groups of the certification test. Results of the four groups of the test were compared, using the Kruskal-Wallis’s test. The null hypothesis of the equality of the means for different groups was rejected at the 5% level of significance. Because the null hypothesis was rejected, the Conover post hoc test was applied for multiple pairwise comparisons, to discern which of the sample pair combinations were significantly different. The paper examines some of the concepts of groups 2 and 3 questions where students struggled the most and rendered insights to overcome those hurdles. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration de Gruyter

Microsoft excel expert certification MO-201: results, analysis and key tips to succeed

Download PDF
8 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/microsoft-excel-expert-certification-mo-201-results-analysis-and-key-R4cLOiFPcm
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2022 Shahid I. Ali et al., published by Sciendo
eISSN
2067-9785
DOI
10.2478/hjbpa-2022-0011
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractMicrosoft Excel skills are imperative in today’s competitive market and the skill is highly demanded by businesses. The MOS Excel Expert Certification (MO-201) validates the competency that one should build to meet employers’ expectations. The paper addresses the statistical mean rank difference in four skill groups of the certification test. Results of the four groups of the test were compared, using the Kruskal-Wallis’s test. The null hypothesis of the equality of the means for different groups was rejected at the 5% level of significance. Because the null hypothesis was rejected, the Conover post hoc test was applied for multiple pairwise comparisons, to discern which of the sample pair combinations were significantly different. The paper examines some of the concepts of groups 2 and 3 questions where students struggled the most and rendered insights to overcome those hurdles.

Journal

HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration – de Gruyter

Published: Dec 1, 2022

Keywords: MOS Excel Expert Test; Non-parametric tests; Advanced Excel functions

There are no references for this article.