Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sonja Gipper (2011)
Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account
Trine Heinemann, A. Lindström, J. Steensig (2011)
Addressing epistemic incongruency in question : answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs
(1969)
Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers
Anita Pomerantz (1984)
Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes
J. Sidnell (2009)
Conversation Analysis: List of tables
J. Heritage (2012)
The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of KnowledgeResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 45
(2010)
Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré
Tanya Stivers (2005)
Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights From Second PositionResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 38
N. Evans (2005)
View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective constructions, 31
U. Faber (2016)
Sequence Organization In Interaction A Primer In Conversation Analysis
(2002)
Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement
Kaoru Hayano (2013)
Territories of knowledge in Japanese conversation
Harvey Sacks, E. Schegloff, G. Jefferson (1974)
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversationLanguage, 50
(2013)
Epistemic perspective in grammar: Theoretical and practical issues
(2011)
The Yurakaré archive. Online language documentation, DobeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen
(2005)
The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences
Erik Gijn (2006)
A grammar of Yurakaré
Abstract This paper investigates the interactional uses of the two Yurakaré (isolate, central Bolivia) epistemic modal markers and = ya ‘intersubjective’ and = laba ‘subjective’. While subjective = laba indicates a personal epistemic judgment of the speaker, intersubjective = ya conveys that the speaker expects the addressee to share the expressed epistemic judgment. The distributions of the two markers in interaction are argued to reflect their (inter)subjective meaning components. This demonstrates that conversational data provide important clues for investigating (inter)subjective meanings in language.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals – de Gruyter
Published: Jul 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.