Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Guest Editorial

Guest Editorial What were you doing in 2001? How much has changed in the world of neuroscience in 17 years? This is the estimated gap between the conduct of high quality research, including randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews, and its eventual implementation into practice. In an era of increasingly rapid changes in technology and patient complexity, and increasing disparities in health outcomes according to geography and socio-economic status there are significant challenges around research keeping up with contemporary practice, and for practice to critique and implement research that supports optimal patient-centred care.The timely and efficient translation of research into practice has great capacity to improve practice and patient outcomes and brings us to the world of implementation science – “The scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings into routine healthcare in clinical, organisational or policy contexts”1A well-established example of a research implementation framework is Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS). It has been developed and tested based on the principles of the strength of the evidence for practice improvement and the preparedness of the clinical context for change.Keeping up with the evidence highlights the importance of conferences such as the upcoming ANNA Annual http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australasian Journal of Neuroscience de Gruyter

Guest Editorial

Kinsman, Leigh
Australasian Journal of Neuroscience , Volume 28 (1): 2 – Jun 1, 2018
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/guest-editorial-wvQ4i38dUj

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2018 Leigh Kinsman., published by Sciendo
eISSN
2208-6781
DOI
10.21307/ajon-2017-005a
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

What were you doing in 2001? How much has changed in the world of neuroscience in 17 years? This is the estimated gap between the conduct of high quality research, including randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews, and its eventual implementation into practice. In an era of increasingly rapid changes in technology and patient complexity, and increasing disparities in health outcomes according to geography and socio-economic status there are significant challenges around research keeping up with contemporary practice, and for practice to critique and implement research that supports optimal patient-centred care.The timely and efficient translation of research into practice has great capacity to improve practice and patient outcomes and brings us to the world of implementation science – “The scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings into routine healthcare in clinical, organisational or policy contexts”1A well-established example of a research implementation framework is Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS). It has been developed and tested based on the principles of the strength of the evidence for practice improvement and the preparedness of the clinical context for change.Keeping up with the evidence highlights the importance of conferences such as the upcoming ANNA Annual

Journal

Australasian Journal of Neuroscience – de Gruyter

Published: Jun 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.