Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Ghassan and Byzantium: A New terminus a quo Von I r f a n Kawar (University of California, Los Angeles) To My Mother One of NOLDEKE>S most important contributions towards the reconstraction of the history of the Ghassanid Dynasty was his discovery of a terminus a qucl·}. This he found in the pages of Pfocopius of Caesarea, and the context clearly pointed to the year 529 A, D., when the Emperor Justinian made Arethas, son of Jabalah, king over most of the Arabs in the Diocese of the Orient2). The selection of this year as a terminus a quo was a reflection of NOLDEKE'S well known views on the relative worth and historical reliability of the three sets of sources, Greek, Syriac, and Arabic3). The serious aspersions he cast on the geneological tables and chronological sequences of the Arab historians -- on which Caussin de Percival had leaned so heavily, but which carried no conviction for NOLPEKE'S critical acumen -- undermined the groundwork on which his predecessor had rested his structure and thus caused it to collapse4). By doing so, NÖLDEKE transferred the emphasis from the Arabic to the Greek and Syriac sources, and thus revolutionised the methodology
Der Islam – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 1958
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.