Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The availability of firearms and the prevalence of gun violence are matters of serious discussion across the United States. Firearm regulation has many facets. It is a constitutional issue and a political issue, a sociological issue and a public health issue. And for the last few decades, it has intermittently – but quite persistently – posed issues for private law.Attempts to regulate guns through tort suits have been more salient than they have been successful. They were salient enough for Congress in 2005 to pass the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which preempts various claims against gun manufacturers for harms caused by their products.15 U.S.C. §§ 7901-7903. Such lawsuits, never particularly successful, are even less viable under PLCAA. For instance, in October of 2016, a Connecticut Superior Court dismissed a lawsuit filed by the families of some victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. The court held that the suit “falls squarely within the broad immunity provided by PLCAA.”Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms Int’l, LLC, No. FBTCV156048103S, 2016 WL 8115354, at *23 (Conn. Super. Ct. Oct. 14, 2016). The case is on appeal to the Connecticut Supreme Court. See Chris Welch, Sandy Hook gun lawsuit
Journal of Tort Law – de Gruyter
Published: Aug 28, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.