Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Natural CO2 springs (mofettes) represent extreme ecosystems with severe exhalations of ambient temperature geological CO2, inducing long-term soil hypoxia. In this paper an overview of mofette research in the fields of microbial ecology and biodiversity in presented, with a focus on the studies describing the impact of the changed soil gas regime on communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, archaea and bacteria. Along with the fast development of new, highthroughput molecular techniques driving the field of molecular ecology, mofettes enable new insights into the importance of the abiotic environmental factors in regulating soil biodiversity, and the community structure of these functionally important microbial groups. Key words: natural CO2 springs, hypoxia, abiotic environmental factors, carbon capture and storage CCS, soil ecology, archaea, bacteria, Glomeromycota IZVLECEK DESETLETJE RAZISKAV NA OBMOCJIH MOFET NAM JE OMOGOCILO NOVE VPOGLEDE V ADAPTACIJO MIKROORGANIZMOV NA ABIOTSKI STRES Naravni izviri CO2 ali mofete predstavljajo ekstremen ekosistem, kjer zaradi izhajanja geoloskega plina v tleh prihaja do dologorocnega pojava hipoksije. V preglednem clanku so predstavljene raziskave z obmocij mofet s podrocja mikrobne ekologije, ki opisujejo vplive sprememenjenih koncentracij talnih plinov na zdruzbe arbuskularnih mikoriznih gliv, arhej in bakterij. Skupaj s hitrim razvojem novih molekulskih pristopov, predvsem novih generacij visokozmogljivega paralelnega sekvenciranja, ki poganjajo podrocje molekularne ekologije, mofete omogocajo raziskovanje vpliva abiotskih dejavnikov okolja na biodiverziteto in strukturo zdruzb teh funkcionalno pomembnih skupin talnih mikrobov. Kljucne besede: naravni izviri CO2, hipoksija, abiotski dejavniki okolja, zajemanje in skladiscenje CO2, ekologija tal, arheje, bakterije, Glomeromycota 1 INTRODUCTION Natural CO2 springs, or mofettes, are extreme ecosystems where ambient temperature geological CO2 reaches the surface, resulting in a severe and relatively constant change in concentrations of soil gases. CO2 vents are present in areas with tectonic activities in many locations worldwide (Pfanz et al., 2004), while in Slovenia they are in the northeastern part of the country close to Gornja Radgona. Several CO2 vents in this area represent Stavesinci mofette system where a soil gas regime has been well described, both spatially and temporally (Vodnik et al., 2006, 2009). In addition, also other soil parameters (e.g. soil chemistry, soil water content) (Vodnik et al., 2006, Vodnik et al., 2009) and plant eco-physiological responses have been well characterized in more than ten scientific University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Agronomy, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, e-mail: irena.macek@bf.uni-lj.si University of Primorska, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, Glagoljaska 8, 6000 Koper, Slovenia str. 209 - 217 papers (e.g. Kaligaric, 2001, Vodnik et al., 2002a, 2002b, Pfanz et al., 2004, Macek et al., 2005, Pfanz et al., 2007). An important but often neglected feature in practically all mofette sites is the CO2 induced soil hypoxia (reduced O2 concentration) that affects all the present biota in this ecosystem (Macek et al., 2005, Macek et al., 2011, Sibanc et al., under review). Hypoxia is a common but usually transient abiotic stress factor that is also present in many other terrestrial ecosystems, e.g. flooded or compacted soils (Perata et al., 2011). Mofette systems, however, enable new insights into microbial responses and adaptations to long-term changes in the soil abiotic environment. This represents a new research direction, driven by the rapid development of the new molecular tools progressively used in research of molecular and microbial ecology. In this paper we present an overview of the mofette research performed over the last decade with a focus on the studies describing the impact of the changed soil gas regime on soil microorganisms, their communities, and biodiversity. This includes several groups of organisms, focusing mainly on the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, bacteria and archaea. Figure 1: A meadow within the Stavesinci mofette area (NE Slovenia) where different groups of soil microorganisms (fungi, bacteria and archaea) have been studied. A decreased growth of vegetation can be seen in the centre of the CO2 vents (in front, left side) with the highest concentrations of geological CO2 in the soil. Slika 1: Travisce znotraj obmocja mofet v Stavesincih (SV Slovenija), kjer so potekale obstojece raziskave razlicnih skupin talnih mikroorganizmov (gliv, bakterij in arhej). V srediscu vrelcev CO2 (levo spredaj) je vidna slabsa rast vegetacije na mestih, kjer je izpostavitev geoloskemu CO2 v tleh najvecja. 2 WHY MOFETTE RESEARCH MATTERS? In the beginning of the 1990s the first reports about the possibilities of using mofettes in environmental and biological studies were published using Italian CO2 springs (e.g. Miglietta et al., 1993, Raschi et al., 1997). Following the initial use primarily for research of the vegetation and plant above-ground responses to elevated, atmospheric CO2 concentrations in the range of those predicted by climate change models (e.g. Raschi et al., 1997) 210 a second feature, the importance of high soil CO2 concentrations and CO2 induced hypoxia in mofette soils and its impact on soil biota, was observed (Macek et al., 2005). Mofettes were consistently shown to be very specific ecosystems with extremely high concentrations of CO2 present in the soil air and high CO2 efflux from soil surface (Vodnik et al., 2006, 2009). This is also one of the reasons why, in the last few years, the focus of mofette research has shifted to the use of different mofette sites as model ecosystems for studies of plant and soil microbial responses to potential CO2 leakage from underground carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems (Lal, 2008, Krüger et al., 2011, Noble et al., 2012, Frerichs et al., 2013). CCS is the process of capturing CO2 from large point sources and depositing it underground. It is proposed as one of the possible measures for storing waste CO2. Thus, in the 20 years of mofette research, the focus of the studies in different fields of applied sciences has moved from the initial studies of plant ecophysiological responses to elevated CO2 in the atmosphere as a long-term natural analogue to other above ground fumigation systems (e.g. FACE Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment experiments), to measuring plant (Macek et al., 2005) and microbial responses (e.g. Macek et al., 2009, Videmsek et al., 2009, Krüger et al., 2011, Macek et al., 2011, Frerichs et al., 2013, Sibanc et al., under review) to high soil CO2 concentrations and CO2 induced hypoxia. Only recently, the first reports on soil fauna responses to CO2 induced soil hypoxia were also published, with a description of the new Collembola species, specific for mofette sites (Russell et al., 2011). Geological CO2 in mofette areas induces changes in several abiotic soil factors, including acidification (Jamnik, 2005), higher concentrations of nutrients due to reduced mineralization rates (Macek et al., 2009), and hypoxia. The latter has been consistently shown as a major abiotic factor affecting soil microbes (Macek et al. 2009, Macek et al., 2011, 2013, Sibanc et al., 2012, Sibanc et al., under review). Hypoxia is not only limited to mofette sites, but is a wider phenomenon and a common transient property of soils that often appears in waterlogged and flooded areas or due to soil compaction. In a special issue of New Phytologist (New Phytologist 190, 2011) on `Plant anaerobiosis' several mechanisms involved in plant response to flooding stress, the effects floods may have on patterns of plant distribution and biodiversity, and the devastating impact on crop growth are described (Perata et al., 2011). Interestingly, no reports on the response of plant symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi or any other rhizosphere organisms to hypoxia were considered in this issue, though rhizosphere organisms represent an important ecosystem component affecting plant performance in practically all natural environments. This however indicates a general rule, since reports on soil hypoxia impacts on rhizosphere and soil biota are scarce, inconsistent and often neglected. Thus, since the first rhizosphere study conducted within the Stavesinci mofette field, focusing on the research of high CO2 concentrations and hypoxia on root respiration (Macek et al., 2005), hypoxia was chosen as the our stress of choice for further investigations: it is present in many natural ecosystems (Perata et al., 2011) and in addition, mofettes provide an unique example of plant and soil communities subject to well characterized (Vodnik et al. 2006, 2009), localized, long-term selection pressure (Macek et al., 2011). This represents a relatively rare opportunity for research of the different aspects of soil ecology and the driving forces of soil diversity in natural ecosystems, and therefore sheds some light on an important research issue that needs immediate attention in order to better understand soil biodiversity and its ecological functions. 3 MOFETTE RESEARCH INTO SOIL MICROBIAL DIVERSITY There is a limited understanding of the importance of abiotic factors in regulating biodiversity and structure of many functionally important microbial communities in soil. Understanding the significance of the soil biota and the feedback between above- and belowground communities may be critical for designing sustainable production systems in the future, and for using the ecosystem services they can provide effectively (Gianinazzi et al., 2010, Mace et al., 2012). Soils represent a dynamic and complex system that requires intense, complex, and logistically difficult sampling strategies in order to get sufficient information that lead to solid conclusions on the biodiversity and the ecological drivers of this diversity. In the last few decades the development of the DNA- and RNA-based methods has increased our knowledge on soil microbial diversity and function with a big boost because of recent development in the high-throughput sequencing methods (e.g. massively parallel pyrosequencing) (e.g. Schloss, 2009, Lemos et al., 2011). Thus, the fast development of the new molecular methods, especially in the fields of metagenetics, metagenomicas and metatranscriptomics, now give us a much better tool to study microbial diversity and its functions in practically all environments, including soils and extreme ecosystems like mofettes (Table 1). Table 1: A list of studies on the different aspects of microbial biology and diversity in mofette soils. Preglednica 1: Seznam studij s podrocja raziskav mikrobiologije in biodiverzitete talnih mikroorganizmov na obmocjih mofet. Microbial group AM fungi Gene region and/or methodology used 16S rRNA gene, T-RFLP, pyrosequencing (Roche 454 FLX), clone libraries Plant root colonization, soil glomalin concentration 16S rRNA gene, RFLP, clone libraries, plant root colonization 26S rRNA D1/D2 domain, sequencing, isolation and culture techniques Plant root colonization, soil glomalin concentration Cell number (qPCR) and activity measurements, nirK genes DGGE fingerprinting 16S rRNA gene, DGGE, activity measurements 16S rRNA gene, T-RLFP, clone libraries cBBl genes, RFLP Substrate induced respiration (SIR) Lipid biomarkers and 13C analyses, cell numbers (qPCR), biomass, and activity measurements 16S-23S spacer region, ITS region, Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA), qPCR, PLFA, enzyme analyses Mofette location Stavesinci, SI, Bossoleto, IT, Cheb basin, CZ Stavesinci, SI Stavesinci, SI Study Macek et al. (2013), Sibanc et al. (2013) Macek et al. (2012) Macek et al. (2011) Sibanc et al. (2012) Rillig et al. (2000) Krüger et al. (2009, 2011) Frerichs et al. (2013) Sibanc et al. (under review) Videmsek et al. (2009) Macek et al. (2009) Beaubien et al. (2008), Oppermann et al. (2010) McFarland et al. (2013) AM fungi AM fungi Soil yeasts Stavesinci, SI AM fungi Soil microbes Hakanoa, New Zealand Larcher See, DE Soil archaea and bacteria Soil archaea and bacteria CO2-fixing bacteria Soil microbes Soil microbes Larcher See, DE Stavesinci, SI Stavesinci, SI Stavesinci, SI Latera Caldera, IT Soil microbes Mammoth Mountain, U.S.A. 212 3.1 CASE STUDY 1 ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI In terrestrial ecosystems, symbiotic associations between plant roots and mycorrhizal fungi are near ubiquitous, with 90 % of all plant species forming mycorrhizas (Smith and Read, 2008). The vast majority of all terrestrial plants receive inorganic nutrients indirectly from symbiotic associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (ph. Glomeromycota) (Fig. 2), via efficient exploration of the soil by fungal hyphae, and not by a direct uptake from the soil by plant roots (Smith and Read, 2008, Hodge et al., 2010). In exchange, the plants supply up to 20 % of photosynthates to the fungi as the only energy source of the fungus (ca five billion tonnes carbon per year) (Bago et al., 2000). The nutrient exchange within plant root cells mainly takes place at the fungus-plant symbiotic interface formed around the finely branched fungal arbuscules (Parniske, 2008). Yet, despite its ecological importance, astonishingly little is known about their ecological and physiological responses to hypoxia (Macek et al., 2011). AM fungi are a functionally important microbial group with poorly understood community ecology (Helgason and Fitter, 2009). Different studies suggest that where an extreme environmental stress occurs in soils, there are a small number of AM fungal lineages that are better able to tolerate those conditions, which results in unique, adapted populations (Helgason and Fitter, 2009, Dumbrell et al., 2010, Macek et al., 2011). AM fungi form an extensive mycelial network in soil and therefore will be subject to strong selection pressures from the abiotic soil environment (e.g. Dumbrell et al., 2010, Macek et al., 2011). However, reports on molecular community analyses and diversity studies of AM fungi in extreme ecosystems are still very scarce (e.g. Appoloni et al., 2008, Macek et al., 2011). In the last 15 years several molecular techniques have been developed, typically targeting different regions of ribosomal rRNA genes that allow identification of the fungal endophytes within roots and soil (e.g. Helgason et al., 1998, Dumbrell et al., 2011). Only recently, some reports on using high-throughput sequencing techniques on the characterization of natural AM fungal communities were published (Öpik et al., 2009, Dumbrell et al., 2011). The newly developed methodology now allows us sufficient sampling intensity within different habitats to answer numerous ecological questions about this important group of soil fungi. However, to the best of our knowledge apart from our research on mofettes (e.g. Macek et al. 2011, 2013) there are no other studies on the direct effect of soil hypoxia on AM fungal communities (Table 1). Within the Stavesinci mofette area, studies on AM fungal root colonization (Macek et al., 2011, 2012), the concentration of glomalin-related soil protein, produced by AM fungi (Macek et al., 2012) and the structure of AM fungal communities (Macek et al., 2011, Macek et al., 2013, Sibanc et al., 2013) were conducted, investigating CO2/hypoxia related responses of this fungal group. Macek et al. (2011) report on significant levels of AM fungal community turnover (beta diversity) between soil types and the numerical dominance of specific AM fungal taxa in hypoxic soils. This work strongly suggests that direct environmental selection acting on AM fungi is a major factor regulating AM fungal communities and their phylogeographic patterns. Consequently, some AM fungi are more strongly associated with local variations in the soil environment than with their host plant's distribution (Macek et al., 2011). There are more reports to follow this initial study of AM fungi in mofette areas, including the ones involving highthroughput sequencing techniques (Roche 454 FLX) (Macek et al., 2013, Sibanc et al., 2013), thus allowing more intensive sampling and more detailed analyses of the mofette AM fungal communities. Figure 2: A cluster of AM fungal spores in a sporocarp, isolated from a glasshouse pot culture initiated with AM fungal inoculum from a location exposed to high geological CO2 concentration (>60 % CO2) within a Stavesinci mofette area. The isolate represents a potentially new AM fungal species. Photos taken by Olympus Provis AX70 microscope and digital camera. Slika 2: Grozd spor AM gliv znotraj glivnega sporokarpa. Spore so bile izolirane iz loncne kulture iz rastlinjaka, inokulirane z vzorcem tal z AM glivami, vzorcenim iz obmocja velike koncentracije geoloskega CO2 znotraj obmocja mofet v Stavesincih. Izolat predstavlja potencialno se neopisano vrsto AM gliv. Posneto z mikroskopom Olympus Provis AX70 in digitalno kamero. 3.2 CASE STUDY 2 SOIL ARCHAEA, BACTERIA and FUNGI Soil is the most biologically diverse environment on Earth, with a biodiversity which can often be several orders of magnitude greater than that present aboveground (Heywood, 1995). A large portion of this diversity involves the greatly unknown diversity of different prokaryotic organisms, bacteria, and archaea. Up to now only a few studies of soil microorganisms from mofette areas were conducted (Table 1). In the Slovenian Stavesinci mofette soils Videmsek et al. (2009) examined the abundance and diversity of cbbL genes, encoding for the large subunit of RubisCO in CO2-fixing bacteria. In this same area Macek et al. (2009) reported on reduced levels of substrate induced respiration (SIR), indicating reduced microbial biomass and activity in high geological CO2 exposed soil. However, apart from the Slovenian Stavesinci mofette, at least two other mofette areas in Europe and one in U.S.A. have been involved in studies of microbial responses to geological CO2 exhalations. First, a terrestrial CO2 vent located at the Laacher See, Germany was used by the group of Krüger et al. (2009, 2011) as a model ecosystem for investigating the impact of potential leakage from 214 carbon capture and storage systems (CCS) on the surrounding environment. They reported on lower bacterial cell numbers, higher levels of bacterial non-isoprenoidical tetraethers lipids (most likely derived from anaerobic bacteria), and higher archaeal cell numbers at the vent compared to the control site. The investigation of archaeal and bacterial communities, based on potential sulphate reduction rates, methane production, and a lipid biomarkers study, showed a shift towards anaerobic and acidophilic species in high CO2 sites. Moreover, recently a study employing molecular markers (community fingerprinting technique denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis DGGE) was used to identify the shifts in the communities of archaea and bacteria among geological CO2 impacted and control soil samples in the mofette field near Laacher See (Frerichs et al., 2013). The study of the abundance of several functional and group-specific gene markers revealed differences in the composition of the mofette soil microbial communities, for example a decrease of Geobacteraceae and an increase in sulphate-reducing taxa in the vent core, reaching moderately elevated (up to 30%) soil CO2 concentrations. Second, within the Latera Caldera mofette in the volcanic district in Central Italy, Beaubien et al. (2008) reported on decreasing trends in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) biomass, bacterial cell counts, and the higher activity of strictly anaerobic, sulphate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea in the centre of the CO2 vent compared to the transit zone and background, while H2 dependant methanogenesis was absent and aerobic methane oxidation was negatively correlated with increased CO2. In addition to this study in the same mofette area, Oppermann et al. (2010) found CO2utilising methanogenic archaea, Geobacteraceae, and sulphate-reducing bacteria mainly at the CO2 vent, only minor quantities were found at the reference site. Also, their results suggest a shift in the microbial community towards anaerobic and acidophilic microorganisms as a consequence of the long-term exposure of the soil environment to high geological CO2 concentrations. A very recent report comes from the Mammoth Mountain, a dormant volcano from eastern California (U.S.A.), and an area known for geological CO2 induced tree mortality (McFarland et al., 2013). The authors of the study assessed the soil microbial community response to CO2 disturbance that resulted in localised tree kill. As a result to reduced soil carbon availability soil microbial biomass decreased, which was linked to the loss of soil fungi. In contrast, archaeal populations responded positively to the CO2 disturbance, presumably due to reduced competition of bacteria and fungi. To our knowledge, however, there is no published data on the overall community structure or diversity of bacteria, and archaea in mofette areas based on clone libraries, and especially so in the most extreme locations (with the soil CO2 concentrations well above 60 %). In these sites, however, CO2 induced hypoxia could strongly affect microbial communities (Sibanc et al., under review). 4 CONCLUSIONS All these studies are important not only for their use in the research of impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations on plants and possible leakage of CO2 in CCS systems and related impacts on biota, but also from a biotechnological and ecological perspective. Extreme environments have previously served as a rich source of potentially useful organisms in different fields of applied biotechnology and agronomy (e.g. new antibiotics discovery, isolates in commercial inoculums of AM fungi). Little is known about what kind of organisms actually live in these habitats and even less about their ecological function. Moreover, as major shifts in microbial community composition have significant implications for ecosystem functioning (e.g. changes in carbon cycling driven by changes in methanogenic archaea populations), understanding their response to long-term environmental changes is of crucial ecological importance. Thus, a full phylogenetic characterisation of fungal, archaeal, and bacterial communities, their taxonomy, and an investigation into the processes regulating their diversity and community structure has yet to be reported (Macek et al., 2013, Sibanc et al., 2012, 2013, Sibanc et al., under review). 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) projects Z4-9295 `The effects of hypoxia and elevated CO2 concentrations on arbuscular mycorrhiza,' J4-2235 `Biodiversity and ecology of extremophilic fungi at natural CO2 springs,' J4-5526 `Response of plant roots and mycorrhizal fungi to soil hypoxia', and a Swiss Contribution Partnership Block Grant SIAMF `Establishment of the Slovenian collection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and promotion of their application in sustainable agriculture and environmental protection'. 6
Acta Agriculturae Slovenica – de Gruyter
Published: Sep 1, 2013
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.