Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction

The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 29 CrossRef

The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction

Wegener, Duane T.; Petty, Richard E.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 29 : 141-208 – Jan 1, 1997
Download PDF

The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction

Wegener, Duane T.; Petty, Richard E.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 29 : 141-208 – Jan 1, 1997

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/the-flexible-correction-model-the-role-of-naive-theories-of-bias-in-ESQxNa4x4w

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0065-2601
DOI
10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60017-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Journal

Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 29 – CrossRef

Published: Jan 1, 1997

References

  • Inoculation and counter-explanation: Debiasing techniques in the perseverance of social theories
    Anderson
  • The causal structure of situations: The generation of plausible causal attributions as a function of type of event situation
    Anderson
  • Effects of explanation and counterexplanation on the development and use of social theories
    Anderson
  • Does subliminality matter to social psychology? Awareness of the stimulus versus awareness of its influence
    Bargh
  • Self-regulation of cognitive inference and decision processes
    Baumeister
  • Feelings, direction of attention, and expressed evaluations of others
    Berkowitz
  • Stereotypes and standards of judgment
    Biernat
  • A dual process model of impression formation
    Brewer
  • The need for cognition
    Cacioppo
  • Measuring generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation: Initial scale development and implications
    Catanzaro
  • Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion
    Chaiken
  • The heuristic model of persuasion
    Chaiken
  • Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context
    Chaiken
  • Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions
    Chartrand
  • Need for cognition and the correspondence bias
    D'Agostino
  • Evaluative judgments of aspects of life as a function of vicarious exposure to emotional extremes
    Dermer
  • Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
    Devine