Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ciara Toole (2012)Medical diagnosis of legal culpability: the impact of early psychiatric testimony in the 19th century English criminal trial.
International journal of law and psychiatry, 35 2
L. Waltman, Nees Eck, E. Noyons (2010)A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks
J. Informetrics, 4
J. Merigó, A. Lafuente, R. Yager (2015)An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators
Appl. Soft Comput., 27
P. Appelbaum (2006)Law & psychiatry: Twenty-five years of law and psychiatry.
Psychiatric services, 57 1
A. Bakri, P. Willett (2011)Computer science research in Malaysia: a bibliometric analysis
Aslib Proc., 63
H. Small, M. Koenig (1977)Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method
Inf. Process. Manag., 13
(2008)Forensic psychiatry and psychology”, Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie
W. Chiu, Y. Ho (2007)Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research
Juntao Zheng, Niancai Liu (2015)Mapping of important international academic awards
Nees Eck, L. Waltman (2009)Vosviewer: A Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping
Econometrics: Computer Programs & Software eJournal
Liang Zhang, Ming-Huang Wang, Jie Hu, Y. Ho (2010)A review of published wetland research, 1991-2008: ecological engineering and ecosystem restoration.
Ecological Engineering, 36
Massimo Franceschet (2010)Ten good reasons to use the EigenfactorTM metrics
Inf. Process. Manag., 46
Nees Eck, L. Waltman (2011)Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer
Carl Bergstrom, Jevin West, Marc Wiseman (2008)The Eigenfactor™ Metrics
The Journal of Neuroscience, 28
Jürgen Jacob, S. Lehrl, A. Henkel (2007)Early recognition of high quality researchers of the German psychiatry by worldwide accessible bibliometric indicators
L. Leydesdorff (2007)Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 58
Qiaoli Zhu, X. Kong, Song Hong, Junli Li, Zongyi He (2015)Global ontology research progress: a bibliometric analysis
Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 67
M. Everett, S. Borgatti (1999)The centrality of groups and classes
Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23
R. Sadoff, F. Dattilio (2012)Formal training in forensic mental health: psychiatry and psychology.
International journal of law and psychiatry, 35 5-6
Christopher Walton, A. Morris (2013)A bibliometric study of taxonomic botany
J. Documentation, 69
A. Brett (2003)Psychiatry, Stigma and Courts
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 10
Nees Eck, L. Waltman (2009)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
Beibei Niu, Song Hong, Jiefei Yuan, Sha Peng, Zhen Wang, Xu Zhang (2013)Global trends in sediment-related research in earth science during 1992–2011: a bibliometric analysis
Yang Cao, Sixing Zhou, Guobin Wang (2013)A bibliometric analysis of global laparoscopy research trends during 1997–2011
Y. Nakatani (2000)Psychiatry and the law in Japan. History and current topics.
International journal of law and psychiatry, 23 5-6
Víctor Cervantes, Ana Santana, G. Ferré, Juan Benito (2009)Hierarchical linear models in psychiatry: A bibliometric study
J. Pantel, C. Mundt (1999)[The evaluation of research performance in psychiatry. Potential and pitfalls of bibliometric analysis].
Der Nervenarzt, 70 3
Ying Ding (2011)Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks
Journal of informetrics, 5 1
P. Ahlgren, Peter Pagin, O. Persson, Maria Svedberg (2015)Bibliometric analysis of two subdomains in philosophy: free will and sorites
E. Şenel, E. Demir (2015)A global productivity and bibliometric analysis of telemedicine and teledermatology publication trends during 1980–2013
Dermatologica Sinica, 33
Lie Yang, Zhulei Chen, Ting Liu, Zhe Gong, Yingjian Yu, Jia Wang (2013)Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis
(2011)Stem cell research . Bibliometric analysis of main research areas through
Jevin West, T. Bergstrom, Carl Bergstrom (2010)The Eigenfactor MetricsTM: A Network Approach to Assessing Scholarly Journals
Coll. Res. Libr., 71
M. Anwar, Sultan Al-Daihani (2011)Literature on terrorism: A bibliometric analysis of articles published during 1981-1990
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16
Psicologia Conductual, 6
P. Nieminen, M. Isohanni (1997)The use of bibliometric data in evaluating research on therapeutic community for addictions and in psychiatry.
Substance use & misuse, 32 5
Qilun Zhu, P. Willett (2011)Bibliometric analysis of Chinese superconductivity research, 1986-2007
Aslib Proc., 63
F. Gilbert, M. Daffern, Diana Talevski, J. Ogloff (2013)Assessment of Past Aggression: Examination of the Convergent Validity of Three Instruments
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20
Gisela Cantos-Mateos, Benjamín Vargas-Quesada, Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, M. Zulueta (2012)Stem cell research: bibliometric analysis of main research areas through KeyWords Plus
Aslib Proc., 64
Hui-Zhen Fu, Y. Ho (2015)A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Membrane Science (1976-2010)
Electron. Libr., 33
Junping Qiu, Hong Lv (2014)An overview of knowledge management research viewed through the web of science (1993-2012)
Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 66
M. Khan, Y. Ho (2012)Top-cited articles in environmental sciences: merits and demerits of citation analysis.
The Science of the total environment, 431
P. García‐García, F. López-Muñoz, G. Rubio, B. Martín-Águeda, C. Álamo (2008)Phytotherapy and psychiatry: bibliometric study of the scientific literature from the last 20 years.
Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology, 15 8
Ying Wu, Z. Duan (2015)Social network analysis of international scientific collaboration on psychiatry research
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 9
K. Stone, E. Whitham, S. Ghaemi (2012)A Comparison of Psychiatry and Internal Medicine: A Bibliometric Study
Academic Psychiatry, 36
Sameer Kumar, J. Jan (2013)Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980–2010
A. Ermer, M. Rösler (2008)Editorial: Forensische Psychiatrie und Psychologie
Zeitschrift Fur Psychiatrie Psychologie Und Psychotherapie, 56
P. Appelbaum (2006)Twenty-Five Years of Law and Psychiatry
P. Han, Jin Shi, Xiaoyan Li, Dongbo Wang, Si Shen, Xinning Su (2013)International collaboration in LIS: global trends and networks at the country and institution level
S. Díaz-Morán, A. Tobeña (2011)[Research contributions of Spanish Psychiatry (2004-2009): a bibliometric analysis of a university department].
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 39 5
Yanhua Zhuang, Xingjian Liu, Thuminh Nguyen, Qingqing He, Song Hong (2013)Global remote sensing research trends during 1991–2010: a bibliometric analysis
L. Freeman (1978)Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Social Networks, 1
M. Tsay, Zhuang Shu (2011)Journal bibliometric analysis: a case study on the Journal of Documentation
J. Documentation, 67
Shashidhar Kaparthi (2005)A Bibliometric Analysis
Journal of Decision Systems, 14
Nees Eck, L. Waltman, R. Dekker, J. Berg (2010)A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS
E. Garfield (2006)The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.
JAMA, 295 1
Erjia Yan, Ying Ding (2009)Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 60
<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>The purpose of this paper (bibliometric analysis) is to analyse the global scientific outputs, research patterns, research emphases and trends of law and psychiatry (L&P) research during 1993-2012 from the Web of Science (WOS) database. Besides, the paper also offers an overview to deepen intercultural understanding and cooperation in the field among professionals concerned with the interface of this research field and related disciplines.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper conducted a bibliometric study of the characteristics and patterns of publication outputs, major journals, network of co-occurrence of authors, international productivity and collaboration.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p><jats:italic>International Journal of Law and Psychiatry</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Psychiatry, Psychology and Law</jats:italic> were the representative journals in the field of L&P research. The results from the analysis of co-occurrence of authors suggest that the L&P co-authorship network analysis is relatively fragmented. In addition, the most productive institution was the University of California System, which published the most inter-institutional collaborative publications and was the top institution by centrality measures. The Harvard University published the most single-institute publications. The most productive country was the USA, which was the top country by centrality measures. The USA was the most collaborative country and took the central position in the collaborative network.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>This is the first study to quantify and evaluate global research productivity in L&P viewed through the WOS during 1993-2012, which might provide a potential guide for future research among professionals concerned with the interface of L&P, as it is a very constructive contribution to the area.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
The Electronic Library – CrossRef
Published: Jun 5, 2017
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.