When Moral Intuitions Are Immune to the Law: A Case Study of Euthanasia and the Act-Omission Distinction in The Netherlands

When Moral Intuitions Are Immune to the Law: A Case Study of Euthanasia and the Act-Omission... © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2009 DOI: 10.1163/156770909X12489459066147 Journal of Cognition and Culture 9 (2009) 149–169 brill.nl/jocc When Moral Intuitions Are Immune to the Law: A Case Study of Euthanasia and the Act-Omission Distinction in Th e Netherlands M. D. Hauser a,b F. Tonnaer c,d M. Cima c a Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA b Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA c Forensic Psychiatric Centre, De Rooyse Wissel, Oostrum, Th e Netherlands d Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Th e Netherlands Abstract Legal scholars and philosophers have long debated the moral standing of the act-omission distinction, with some favoring the view that actions ought to be considered as morally diff erent from omissions, while others disagree. Several empirical studies suggest that people judge actions that cause harm as worse than omissions that cause the same harm with the implication that our folk psychology commonly perceives this distinction as morally signifi cant. Here we explore the robustness of people’s moral intuitions, and in particular, whether the omission bias can be eliminated in the face of explicit and familiar laws that take away http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Cognition and Culture Brill

When Moral Intuitions Are Immune to the Law: A Case Study of Euthanasia and the Act-Omission Distinction in The Netherlands

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/when-moral-intuitions-are-immune-to-the-law-a-case-study-of-euthanasia-9meItoXUmJ
Publisher
BRILL
Copyright
© 2009 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1567-7095
eISSN
1568-5373
D.O.I.
10.1163/156770909X12489459066147
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2009 DOI: 10.1163/156770909X12489459066147 Journal of Cognition and Culture 9 (2009) 149–169 brill.nl/jocc When Moral Intuitions Are Immune to the Law: A Case Study of Euthanasia and the Act-Omission Distinction in Th e Netherlands M. D. Hauser a,b F. Tonnaer c,d M. Cima c a Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA b Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA c Forensic Psychiatric Centre, De Rooyse Wissel, Oostrum, Th e Netherlands d Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Th e Netherlands Abstract Legal scholars and philosophers have long debated the moral standing of the act-omission distinction, with some favoring the view that actions ought to be considered as morally diff erent from omissions, while others disagree. Several empirical studies suggest that people judge actions that cause harm as worse than omissions that cause the same harm with the implication that our folk psychology commonly perceives this distinction as morally signifi cant. Here we explore the robustness of people’s moral intuitions, and in particular, whether the omission bias can be eliminated in the face of explicit and familiar laws that take away

Journal

Journal of Cognition and CultureBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2009

Keywords: EUTHANASIA; LAW; COGNITIVE PENETRABILITY; UNIVERSALITY; MORAL INTUITIONS; OMISSION BIAS

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off