Van Pelt v. France

Van Pelt v. France 253 11 hrcd [ 2000 ] VAN PELT v. FRANCE Right to a fair trial – violation Articles 6, Sections 1 and 3 Failure of an applicant to appear in court, although in hospital at the time, resulted in the dismissal of his application for an adjournment and his lawyers being refused permission to make submissions on his behalf. This contravened the right of every accused to be effectively represented by a lawyer which is a fundamental feature of the right to a fair trial. An accused did not forfeit that right merely by not being present at the hearing. Declaring an appeal to the Court of Cassation inadmissible solely on the ground that the appellant had failed to comply with a warrant requiring him to surrender to custody constituted an unreasonable interference with his right to a court and thus to his right to a fair trial. In a judgment delivered on 23 May 2000 in the case of Van Pelt v. France , the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been no violation of Article 6 , Section 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights (by five http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Rights Case Digest Brill

Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/brill/van-pelt-v-france-tupbQcbQgL
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

253 11 hrcd [ 2000 ] VAN PELT v. FRANCE Right to a fair trial – violation Articles 6, Sections 1 and 3 Failure of an applicant to appear in court, although in hospital at the time, resulted in the dismissal of his application for an adjournment and his lawyers being refused permission to make submissions on his behalf. This contravened the right of every accused to be effectively represented by a lawyer which is a fundamental feature of the right to a fair trial. An accused did not forfeit that right merely by not being present at the hearing. Declaring an appeal to the Court of Cassation inadmissible solely on the ground that the appellant had failed to comply with a warrant requiring him to surrender to custody constituted an unreasonable interference with his right to a court and thus to his right to a fair trial. In a judgment delivered on 23 May 2000 in the case of Van Pelt v. France , the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been no violation of Article 6 , Section 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights (by five

Journal

Human Rights Case DigestBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off