UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Americans with Disabilities Act ― permissibility of a regulation by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission authorizing refusal to hire an individual because his performance on the job would endanger his own health ― scope of permissible adminstarative rule making HEADNOTES Facts Chevron refused to hire Echazabal because of his liver condition, which its doctors said would be exacerbated by continued exposure to toxins at its refinery, and also requested its contractors, which then employed Echazabal, either to reassign him to a job with no exposure to toxins or to remove him from the refinery. Echazabal filed suit against Chevron claiming that its actions violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Chevron relied on an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulation per- mitting the defense that a worker's disability on the job would pose a direct threat to his health. The Federal District Court granted Chevron summary judgment, but the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that the EEOC regulation went beyond the scope of permissible rulemaking under the ADA. The Supreme Court granted ceritoriari. Decision Reversed. The ADA permits the EEOC's regulation. Chevron had a valid legal excuse for its actions. Law applied Americans with http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Labour Law Reports Online Brill

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/united-states-of-america-1q9VMHNTGo
Publisher
Martinus Nijhoff
Copyright
Copyright 2001 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0168-6526
eISSN
2211-6028
D.O.I.
10.1163/221160202X00158
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Americans with Disabilities Act ― permissibility of a regulation by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission authorizing refusal to hire an individual because his performance on the job would endanger his own health ― scope of permissible adminstarative rule making HEADNOTES Facts Chevron refused to hire Echazabal because of his liver condition, which its doctors said would be exacerbated by continued exposure to toxins at its refinery, and also requested its contractors, which then employed Echazabal, either to reassign him to a job with no exposure to toxins or to remove him from the refinery. Echazabal filed suit against Chevron claiming that its actions violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Chevron relied on an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulation per- mitting the defense that a worker's disability on the job would pose a direct threat to his health. The Federal District Court granted Chevron summary judgment, but the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that the EEOC regulation went beyond the scope of permissible rulemaking under the ADA. The Supreme Court granted ceritoriari. Decision Reversed. The ADA permits the EEOC's regulation. Chevron had a valid legal excuse for its actions. Law applied Americans with

Journal

International Labour Law Reports OnlineBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial